Grammatical difference between British and American English

Content American English2 Lexical difference4 Grammatical difference 6 Bibliography.8 Grammatical difference between British and American English. American English. In the early part of the seventeenth century English settlers began to bring their language to America, and another series of changes began to take place. The settlers borrowed words from Indian languages for such strange trees as the hickory and persimmon,

such unfamiliar animals as raccoons and woodchucks. Later they borrowed other words from settlers from other countries for instance, chowder and prairie from the French, scow and sleigh from the Dutch. They made new combinations of English words, such as backwoods and bullfrog, or gave old English words entirely new meanings, such as lumber which in

British English means approximately junk and corn which in British means any grain, especially wheat . Some of the new terms were needed, because there were new and un-English things to talk about. Others can be explained only on the general theory that languages are always changing, and American English is no exception. Aside from the new vocabulary, differences in pronunciation, in grammatical construction, and especially

in intonation developed. If the colonization had taken place a few centuries earlier, American might have become as different from English as French is from Italian. But the settlement occurred after the invention of printing, and continued through a period when the idea of educating everybody was making rapid progress. For a long time most of the books read in America came from

England, and a surprising number of Americans read those books, in or out of school. Moreover, most of the colonists seem to have felt strong ties with England. In this they were unlike their Anglo-Saxon ancestors, who apparently made a clean break with their continental homes. A good many Englishmen and some Americans used to condemn every difference that did develop, and as recently as a generation ago it

was not unusual to hear all Americanisms condemned, even in America. It is now generally recognized in this country that we are not bound to the Queen s English, but have a full right to work out our own habits. Even a good many of the English now concede this, though some of them object strongly to the fact that Americanisms are now having an influence on British usage.

There are thousands of differences in detail between British and American English, and occasionally they crowd together enough to make some difficulty. If you read that a man, having trouble with his lorry, got out his spanner and lifted the bonnet to see what was the matter, you might not realize that the driver of the truck had taken out his wrench and lifted the hood. It is amusing to play with such differences, but the theory that the

American language is now essentially different from English does not hold up. It is often very difficult to decide whether a book was written by an American or an English man. Even in speech it would be hard to prove that national differences are greater than some local differences in either country. On the whole, it now seems probable that the language habits of the two countries will grow more, rather than less, alike, although some differences will

undoubtedly remain and others may develop. It also seems probable that there will be narrow-minded and snobbish people in both countries for some time to come. But generally speaking, anybody who learnsto speak and write the standard English of his own country, and to regard that of the other country as a legitimate variety with certain interesting differences, will have little trouble wherever he goes.

Lexical difference. Lexical differences of american variant highly extensive on the strength of multiple borrowing from spanish and indian languages, what was not in british english. American variant British variant Subway метро underground the movies кинотеатр the cinema shop магазин store sidewalk тротуар pavement line очередь queue soccer футбол football mailman почтальон postman vacation каникулы holiday corn кукуруза maize fall осень autumn

Also claim attention differences in writing some words in american and british variants of language. For instance, following American variant British variant honor honour traveler traveller plow plough defense defence jail gaol center centre apologize apologise Grammatical difference. Grammatical differences of american variant consist in following 1. In that events, when Britainians use Present Perfect, in

Staffs can be used and Present Perfect, and Past Simple. 2. Take a showera bath instead of have a showera bath. 3. Shall is not used. In all persons is used by will. 4. Neednt do usually is not used. Accustomed form -dont need to do. 5. After demand, insist, require etc should usually is

NOT used. I demanded that he apologize instead of I demanded that he should apologise in british variant. 6. toin THE hospital instead of toin hospital in BrE. 7. on the weekendon weekend instead of at the weekendat weekend. 8. on a street instead of in a street. 9. Different from or than instead of different tofrom 10. Write is used with to or without the pretext. 11. Past participle of got is gotten 12.

To burn, to spoil and other verbs, which can be regular or irregular in the british variant, in the american variant ALWAYS regular. 13. Past Perfect, as a rule, is not used completely. Bibliography 1. Murphy Raymond. English Grammar in Use Cambridge University Press, 2. Орлов Г.А. Современный английский язык в Австралии. Москва, Высшая школа,

1978. 3. Варианты полинациональных литературных языков Киев, Наукова думка, 1981. 4. Швейцер А.Д. Американский вариант литературного английского языка пути формирования и современный статус.Вопросы языкознания,1995, 6,стр. 3-17. 5. Г.Б.Антрушина, О.В.Афанасьева. Лексикология английского языка М. Изд. Дрофа. 1999 6. F.R.Palmer. Semantics. A new outline

M. V.Sh. 1982. 7. Александрова С.Я. Семантический анализ сложноподчиненных предложений с придаточными, вводимыми союзами as и as thougt Вопросы грамматической структуры предложения и текста в английском языкеСб. науч. тр М 1985 Вып.247 С.86-96. 8. Бабалова Л.Л. Об употреблении союзов и, а, но в сложном предложении Русский язык за рубежом 1980 N4 С.57-62. 9. Биренбаум

Я.Г. К теории сложного предложения На материале английского языка Вопросы языкознания 1982 N2 С.50-58. 10. Биренбаум Я.Г. Сопоставление сложноподчиненных предложений русского и английского языков Сопоставительный лингвистический анализ Науч. тр Куйбышев, 1977 Т.202 С.29-32. 11. Валимова Г.В. О сочинительных союзах в сложном предложении

Материалы IX и X конференций Северо-Кавказского зонального объединения кафедр русского языка Ростов нД Изд-во Рост. ун-та, 1971 С.87-93. 12. Верховская И.П. К вопросу о классификации сложноподчиненных предложений в современном английском языке Проблемы грамматики английского языка Сб. науч. тр М,1981 Вып.173 С.31-43. 13. Гвоздев А.Н. Современный русский литературный язык.

Ч.2 Синтаксис М. Просвещение, 1958 301 с. 14. Гепнер Ю.Р. Сложное предложение и принципы его изучения Учеб. пособие Харьков, 1963. 15. Данкова М.П. Структурные и статистические характеристики сложносочиненных предложений в авторской и разговорной речи художественной прозы на материале английского языка Теория и практика лингвистического описания разговорной речи

Горький, 1976 Вып.7 С.127-133. 16. Жельвис В.И. К вопросу о видах синтаксической связи между частями сложного союзного предложения На материале английского языка Ученые записки Ленинградского государственного педагогического института. Кафедра английского языка 1958 Т.181, вып.3 С.343-366. 17. Жельвис В.И. Существуют ли в языке сочинительные и подчинительные союзы

На материале английского языка Ученые записки Ленинградского государственного педагогического института. Вопросы английской филологии. -1962 Т.226 С.253-273. 18. Ильиш Б.А. Современный английский язык Теорет. курс. Учеб. пособие для вузов. -2-е изд испр. и доп М 1948 347 с. 19. Ильиш Б.А. Строй современного английского языка

Учеб. пособие для студ.пед.ин-тов 2-е изд Л. Просвещение, 1971 365 с. 20. Ильиш Б.А. Структура сложноподчиненного предложения в современном английском языке Ученые записки Ленингр. гос. пед. ин-та. Вопросы английской филологии 1962 Т.226 С.3-25. 21. Иофик Л.Л. Сложное предложение в новоанглийском языке Л. Изд-во Ленигр. ун-та, 1968. 22. Карпова Л.В. О функциональном критерии в синтаксисе на материале

сложноподчиненных предложений с союзом as, when Некоторые проблемы слова и предложения в современном английском языке Респ. сб Горький, 1976 С.176-192. 23. Конькова И.П. Сложносочиненное союзное предложение в современном английском языке. Душанбе, 1969 240 с. 24. Леденев Ю.И. О наиболее существенных свойствах русских союзов Русский язык Материалы и исследования - Ставрополь,

1971 Вып.3 С.36-42. 25. Оганесова Р.Д Скорлуповская Е.В. О выделении сочинительных союзов Материалы IX и X конференций Северо-Кавказского зонального объединения кафедр русского языка Ростов нД Изд-во Рост. ун-та, 1971 С.94-102. 26. Петерсон М.Н. Союзы в русском языке Русский язык в школе 1952

N5 С.28-34. 27. Хаймович Б.С Роговская Б.И. Теоретическая грамматика английского языкаУчеб.пособие для вузов М. Высшая школа,1967 297с. 28. Ширяев Е.Н. Дифференциация сочинительных и подчинительных союзов на синтаксической основе Филологические науки 1980 N2 С.49-54. 29. Семантико-стилистические исследования текста и предложенияМежвуз. сб. науч. тр. Отв.ред. З.Я.Тураева Л 1980 125 с. 30. Качалова К.

Н Израилевич Е.Е. Практическая грамматика английского языка с упражнениями и ключами. М, 1997 717 с. 31. Бархударов Л.С Штелинг Д.А. Грамматика английского языка М 1973. 32. Гальперин И.Р. Очерки по стилистике английского языка М 1958. 33. Cronin A.J. The Citadel М 1966. 34. Galsworthy J. To let М, 1954. 35. London I. Martin Eden М 1954. 36.

Green G. Quet Amerikan М 1956. 37. Hardy T. Tess of the d Urbervilles М, 1950. 38. Dickens Ch. Adventures of Oliver Twist M 1949.