CHILDREN'S AND YOUTHFUL CRIMINALITY IN THE USA

CHIIMINALITY IN THE USA In 1956 г, in the USA left the book “Youthful criminality” under edition S.Meklelana's Grant. This book represents the collection of articles of the American authors who are engaged in research of a problem of children's and youthful criminality in its various aspects. In the book opinions of responsible statesmen, lawyers, psychiatrists, sociologists,

writers, teachers, parents and representatives of other groups of the population at a problem of criminality among minors in the USA are stated. In the present information those opinions which represent the greatest interest for the Soviet reader are short stated only. In particular, considerable interest is caused by sights of some the American authors of the reasons of children's and youthful criminality and about methods with which

help, in their opinion, ostensibly it is possible to achieve decrease in growth of criminality among minors in the USA. In the majority the American authors investigating questions of children's and youthful criminality, are far from disclosing of the valid reasons of criminality among minors. In the USA they try to explain enormous growth of children's and youthful criminality any the minor reasons. Only separate authors in the articles presented in the considered book, try to hint shy at

the true reasons of criminality among minors, without opening thus completely the sights on this point in question. All American authors who are engaged in research of a problem of children's and youthful criminality in the USA, mark huge growth of criminality among minors. The children's and youthful criminality is a tragedy of the modern American validity. The problem of children's and youthful criminality in the

USA, according to the majority of authors, is sharper, than in any ругой to the world country. Data, available FBI, show that the crimes of all poisons made in the country in 1954, have increased on 8,2 % in comparison with 1953, in 1953 the criminality was above on 8 % in comparison with 1952 How much this general increase in criminality in the USA is caused by growth of criminality among minors, it is visible from the following data.

According to FBI, in 1953 young criminals to 18-year-old age had been made 53,6 % from among all automobile thefts in 1174 cities; 49,3 % of all burglaries; 40,1 % of all other kinds of thefts; 18 % of all robberies and 16,2 % of all rapes. If the tendency to growth of children's and youthful criminality takes place and further the following generation will witness a result more than 41,8 million cases of larceny, 15,8 million burglaries, 7,4 million automobile thefts,

2 million robberies, 3 million physical violence and more than 200 thousand Americans will appear killed. Now in the USA every year more than 1 million teenagers make one or several crimes. If it will not be possible to suspend growth of criminality among minors, that, according to Klendenena (see the named book, p. 9 and сл.), by 1960 the children's criminality increases more than to 1,5 million cases a year. The children's and youthful criminality in the

USA in the development as some authors mark, accepts more and more rough and severe forms. Young criminals who broke 10 years ago street lanterns, break now skulls of people. Therefore, according to Evane (p. 41—42), the problem of children's and youthful criminality is one of the greatest problems in a life of a modern American society. Than so wide development and rise in crime among minors in the

USA speaks? On this question among the American authors who are engaged in research of children's and youthful criminality, there is no common opinion. Barron Milton (p. 59—63) considers that in movement of children's and youthful criminality is observed defined кругооборот or fluctuation. He cannot explain these fluctuations, but their studying, from its point of view, allows to draw the important conclusions.

The children's and youthful criminality increases during the periods of economic prosperity and falls down during the depression periods, increases in a preparation time to war and the war and falls during the world. From here Milton concludes that most plausible reasons of increase in criminality among minors in the USA are either war or prosperity. The opposite picture is observed with criminality of adults. The criminality of adults begins to decline during prosperity and war and rises during depression and

the world. Milton explains this opposite tendency of criminality of adults and children to that character of economic changes in military or the peace time renders various psychological, social and economic influence on adults and children. Some American authors great value in development of criminality among minors give religions. In their opinion, disbelief in god — the serious factor influencing growth of children's and youthful criminality. According to many, on growth of criminality among minors the great

influence is rendered by the comics published in the USA in million circulations and in the majority describing crimes, made mainly minors. Influence of these comics on children hugely. Comics specially intend for teenagers and, in essence, contain all necessary lessons how it is necessary to commit crimes. Teenagers study on such comics and go on crimes already with the ready recipe.

The violence and sadism are preached in many comics. And all it is accompanied by evident illustrations. Under the influence of one only comics the criminality of minors in the USA has increased in 1954 in comparison with 1947 by 20 %. Vertham Frederik (p. 78—91) as a result of numerous supervision and researches has come to a conclusion

that the comics describing crimes, are the serious factor in growth of children's and youthful criminality now. At the same time he believes that comics not unique and in many cases at all the most important factor, but, undoubtedly, most inexcusable factor. The part of authors considers children's and youthful criminality in the USA as result of imitation. Finally, from their point of view, young criminals gain experience and knowledge

in criminal craft from adults surrounding them. Between criminality of adults and minors there is a direct communication: when children on experience of adults see that the laws establishing certain rules of behaviour, the regulating questions connected with drunkenness, gamblings, trade etc can be ignored; see that adults can leave “dry water”, they start to imitate this adults. On development of criminality among minors the great influence renders distribution to the

USA alcoholic drinks and drugs. Along with alcoholic drinks and drugs in the USA on minors fatal influence the photos render, the illustrated playing cards, патефонные plates, cinema, television screens, the slides, the illustrated books and the brochures representing low sexual distortions. The large quantity of all these pornographic materials specially intends for youth that makes the big business which income fluctuates annually between 100 and 300 million dollars.

Absence of effective laws on struggle against spread of drug addiction and the pornographies, poisoning minds and bodies of teenagers, from the point of view of many authors, is one of the serious reasons of children's and youthful criminality in the USA. Some explain criminality as result bad personal приспособляемости to environment. The part of authors specifies in overflow of schools, weakness of laws, a wide circulation of cases

оставления children parents, public indifference to children who are in a difficult situation, and other circumstances as on social conditions or the reasons which promote growth of criminality among minors. Sights of the American authors at the reasons of criminality among minors are inconsistent. Some authors consider children's and youthful criminality as result of severe conditions by which the life in slums is characterised. They specify that the families living in these slums, usually very poor,

huddle in small rooms. Parents often face the great difficulties connected with unemployment. Therefore in blighted areas almost all possible forms of crimes and defects more often concentrate. According to other authors, a prevailing sight that young criminals in the majority leave from трущобных areas and poor families, now does not represent the facts. Young criminals leave equally as families with an average or well-founded prosperity, and from families

with a low prosperity. The part of authors asserts that the majority of young criminals is “sick children”. Their opponents categorically deny it. From their point of view, young criminals mentally healthy and physically strong, like all those children who do not make crimes. Separate researchers a criminality principal cause see in parents. They consider that in most cases crimes are made by children of whom parents do not care or carelessly

concern their education. Wrong education of the child in family conditions results, from their point of view, in development of criminal bents in the early childhood, and to liquidate these bents subsequently hardly. If parents carelessly concern education of children, the last go on street and become criminals. As show the data when the teenager goes on a crime, it is usually found out that this teenager has been left by parents to the mercy of fate, of it did not care, conflicts made on it between parents,

drunkenness and any other untoward influences in a family bad impact. The divorce wide circulation, stiffness in mutual relations between parents, absence of normal conditions, care and supervision and other abnormalities in family conditions make considerable impact on growth of criminality of minors in the USA. A number of authors considers wrong the reasons of children's and youthful criminality to reduce to influence of parents or abnormal relations in a family.

They believe that the criminality reason are bad material conditions, lacks of religious education, bad school conditions, the description of violence in films or telecasts etc. Sights of the American researchers and at a school role in development of children's and youthful criminality in the USA are inconsistent. One assert that between criminality of minors and school there is a direct communication, others deny it. So, for example, Howard

Uajtman (p. 71—78) specifies that the discipline of teenagers became now the big problem at schools of the USA. In a number of schools management and managers do not spend any work on discipline maintenance at school. Uajtman results cases of drawing of physical injuries knifes, beatings of teachers, colliding of women downwards on school ladders, murders of other pupils from fire-arms, extortionate night attacks and other crimes made by pupils. A bit different point of view on a case in point

Ernest adheres to O.Melbi (p. 69—71). He agrees that the discipline at some schools of the USA really is a critical problem. However, in its opinion, the serious antisocial acts made by minors, are rather rare. Now serious disciplinary problems arise at the American schools where educational process is badly adjusted. At schools in which teachers are able to interest the pupils, seldom it is necessary to meet difficulties

in discipline. In sights of the authors which articles are presented in the considered book, has not found the acknowledgement opinion existing in the USA that the criminality among the Negro population is more extended than among the white population. In particular, as specifies Klendenen (p. 14 and сл.), there is no basis to assert that the criminality is ostensibly more inherent in Negroes, than any other members of the

American society. Thus, many American authors studying children's and youthful criminality, cannot or simply do not wish to open the main reason of growth of criminality among minor century of the USA, rooting in the essence of a capitalist system. From here, naturally, and methods which they offer in struggle against children's and youthful criminality, cannot affect a little essentially decrease in criminality among minors and the more so, completely

to resolve a problem of children's and youthful criminality in the USA. In struggle against children's and youthful criminality in the USA the diversified actions are offered. Some of them have naive character. So, for example, Edgar Hoover (p. 169—175), considers that the problem of children's and youthful criminality can be resolved ostensibly ”only by inculcation by the adult of high moral qualities by means of religion.

Other American authors also specify in a religion great influence in the prevention of crimes. In their opinion, the church and a synagogue are the important means for inculcation of moral and social qualities of the American youth. From the point of view of many, the most effective action which can be undertaken for the control over children's and youthful criminality, education of parents in the spirit of correct performance of the parental duties by them is.

For decrease in children's and youthful criminality it is offered to undertake the certain steps directed on strengthening of a family and elimination or, at least, restriction of many conditions, harmful to children, maintenance with councils and the help in family questions, to complicate divorces, to improve the program of entertainments, to strengthen censorship of telecasts, films, etc. As one of actions for struggle against children's and youthful criminality some offer strengthening

of responsibility of minor criminals. From their point of view, reform of criminal punishment should bring success in struggle against criminality of minors. One of the practical actions ostensibly promoting realisations”the control over children's and youthful criminality in the USA, according to Hoover, is removal of fingerprints at all teenagers arrested for serious crimes. He suggests to transfer conducting struggle against children's and youthful criminality

in hands of national police as last to do it easier and easier. Local police: has no sufficient experience of struggle against criminality of minors. Carrying out in a life of this action, according to Hoover, ostensibly is the important step to the decision of a problem of children's and youthful criminality to the USA. Necessary action in struggle against criminality of minors, from the point of view of separate

authors, is the liability of parents for causing of a property damage of a private property by their children. The press disclosing in the press names of those young criminals which commit heavy and repeated crimes, also can make essential impact on parents and force them to give more than attention to behaviour of children. Many among minors consider as serious action for the prevention of criminality a direction of their energy on useful business. In last generations, from their point of view, teenagers worked

more, therefore to keep them in hands it was easier, than now. During the modern mechanised epoch children often appear in a trouble of that at them it is too much free time. For this reason it is necessary to support more the civil (secular), school and church organisations providing the programs of rest for youth. Some American authors for struggle against criminality of minors offer carrying out of certain system psychiatric and any to other help to young criminals, strengthening

of care of children in арестных houses, any organisation of establishments, clubs, hospitals, etc. Many consider that with children's and youthful criminality it is possible faster and to struggle more economically by wide realisation of programs of education and rest for all children in national comprehensive schools. The great value in struggle against growth of criminality among minors, according to separate authors, has an employment of the young men who have left school.

The big possibilities in the prevention of criminality of minors many authors see at school. With that end in view they offer to spend a new sort of the discipline at schools, which essence consists in creating round teenagers disciplining conditions, to have on them the psychological influence, a sense of responsibility imparting by it for the acts. And, the new discipline, from their point of view, will be effective means only in the event that parents

and teachers will hang together in carrying out of disciplinary influence on teenagers and at schools and at home. As preventive maintenance against consumption of drugs separate authors offer hospitalisation of addicts and a strict compulsory sentence about jail placement without removal of action or conditional clearing on bail of the minor criminals recognised guilty of spread of drug addiction. For struggle against children's and youthful criminality some authors suggest to limit or liquidate

gamblings for children. From their point of view, the public opinion should raise the voice against owners of the brothels, secretly selling to teenagers spirits and various pornographic products. The maintenance of the considered book is that in general.