Environmental Taxes Essay Research Paper Doyou reconcile

Environmental Taxes Essay, Research Paper

Do

you reconcile the introduction of environmental-based tax rate differentiation

as well as new environmental taxes with the traditional objectives of fiscal

reform: tax simplification, fiscal neutrality (not affecting behavior)? A1. This

has to be done very carefully, as introducing new taxes that are related to the

environment, can dramatically affect people?s behavior. If you levy new taxes

on vehicles that produce high amount of pollution, like Sport Utility vehicles

people are no longer going to purchase those vehicles. This tax is something

that has to be eased on to the public and the public has to be educated as to

how these environmental taxes will work. The bottom line is that the public

needs to be educated as to why these taxes are being levied. Q2. With the

exception of a lump-sum tax, all conventional taxes have distortion cost in the

form of affecting the taxpayer?s economic behavior: work-leisure choice,

consumption-savings allocation, etc. Wouldn?t environmental taxes have the

same dead weight loss by affecting consumption and production behavior? A2.

These taxes would not be a dead weight loss because after the public was

educated, I believe that they would be aware the there was considerable

environmental benefit involved with these new taxes. They also might make people

think twice before polluting the environment, because they may realize that the

end result is that they are paying to clean it up. Q3. What is the

distributional incidence of environmental taxes? Or, Who benefits and who loses

from specific taxes, how can distributional concerns, a major constraint to the

acceptability of environmental taxes, be addressed in a satisfactory way? A3.

The general public are those who will benefit from these new taxes, due to the

fact that pollution will be reduced and the environment will become cleaner and

a better place to live. This tax also improves income distribution, and will be

distributed proportionally across the board. It will also improve the

environment by saving money and realigning polices that are setup as an

incentive to practice environmentally sound practices. This is set up to improve

economic efficiency and reduce waste that is produced by public and state

enterprise. The distributional cost will be addressed through a proportionally

distributed tax, and not a disproportion tax that benefit the rich. Q4. How do

you address International competitiveness concerns raised by industry with

regard to (unilateral) Introduction of environmental taxes? A4. This should be

handled very carefully, if taxes are introduced unilaterally, this could risk

pricing itself out of the market. The reason for this is if the taxes were to

dramatic, companies may take their industry, and plants outside of the country,

thus loosing millions in other types of tax revenue, jobs and other economic

well being. Q5. At what level should taxes on particular products be set in

order to reflect the environmental costs associated with their production and

use? A5. Tax levels should be set so that they don?t exceed a certain

percentage of the cost of the product. If there are situations in which the

products environmental cost would be higher than the cost of the product, there

should be some type of tax ceiling; a fair figure would probably be around 25%

of the cost. These levels should be set in order to maintain control on

pollution, while at the same time, not making them so expensive so that the

specified product is priced out of the market, reducing demand, forcing

consumers to seek a substitute product. Q8. What is the preferred type of

environmental Taxes? What determines the choice between direct taxes (on

emissions) and indirect taxes (on products and inputs)? A8. The preferred tax is

a direct tax which typical which will affect industry, and consumers depending

on their income and amount that the pollute. Indirect taxes are unfavorable

because they put a tax burden on products such as food clothing and shelter,

which are the commodities that the poor spend a higher percentage of their money

on in relation to those who are wealthier. The government when implementing

taxes determines, how much revenue needs to be created, and how they me obtain

the most exposure to pay for the tax. For example those who use The Mass Pike

are taxed by paying the tolls. This doesn?t cover the entire cost of operating

the highway system, but subsidizes the operating cost. Q10. What is the

difference between taxes and charges? Under what conditions are environmental

taxes and charges identical? Which do you feel is politically more acceptable?

A10. The difference between taxes and charges is that the charges were set up

after the damage was done, and the tax was setup to correct the problem that the

pollution created along the way. The wanted to charge the farmers for water, but

others said that they couldn?t afford it. Taxes and charges are very similar

in the way they work they are both there to curve pollution and to correct it

after it occurs. Q12. How do you make the introduction of environmental taxes

socially and politically more acceptable? How do you ensure public and political

support? In other Words, How might environmental taxes be introduced with the

minimal amount of resistance and disruption? A12. These environmental taxes must

be slowly introduced to the people, through billboards, commercials and

editorials that describe the condition of the environment, The after this has

been established these can be followed by a campaign on how to reduce pollution

and increase the well-being of the environment. This campaign can be the base

for the introduction of the new taxes. Once people know of the state of the

economy, they may be more willing to accept these new taxes. Q14. Is there a

strong case for earmarking environmental tax revenues for environmental

expenditures under what circumstances? If environmental taxes are introduced as

incentive systems (rather than as revenue raising mechanisms) shouldn?t

environmental investments are financed by general tax revenue? What are the

usual reasons for objecting to earmarking the Finance Minister Alluded to? A14.

In this case tax revenues should be spent to correct the environmental problems,

the nightly brown outs are not acceptable. This tax revenue should be allocated

and dispersed to help remedy the environmental problems. This general revenue

should finance them so that these problems will be fixed and at the same time

the amount of pollution will decrease because people will not want to pay this

environmental tax. They felt that the fiscal and environmental tax revenue was

being wasted, they were dumping this money in to the system with no change, and

there were no new innovative ideas. Everyone was only concerned with their

sector, and was happy with the continuation of status quo.