Gangs Essay Research Paper GangsIntroductionI A

Gangs Essay, Research Paper

Gangs

Introduction

I. -A Los Angeles family takes a wrong turn into gang territory and is fired

upon. A 3-year-old is killed and her 2-year-old brother wounded.

-A Chinese immigrant in Brooklyn is kidnapped by a Chinatown gang which

demands ransom payments from her family. She is murdered when the family fails to pay.

-Two FBI agents and a police sergeant are murdered inside the Washington,

D.C. police headquarters by a gang member.

-A Pittsburgh police sergeant walking home with his daughter is killed with

his own gun after he stops and confronts a gang spraying graffiti on a street.

II. Resolved : that the Federal Government should pass laws to prevent the

development gang related youth violence.

Definitions-

1. Development: as defined in Websters Dictionary is ?to make more

elaborate; to enlarge?

2. Gang: as defined in Websters is ?A group of persons who are organized

and work together or socialize regularly; a group of adolescent hoodlums or

criminals; gang up on; to attack as a group.?

3. Violence: as defined in Websters is ?Physical force or activity used

to cause harm, damage or abuse?

4. Youth: as defined in Websters is ?The appearance or state of

appearing young; the time of life when one is not considered a adult; a young person?

III. Our current juvenile justice system is no longer adequate for

today’s hardened young gang members. Demographics indicated this problem is not

going away. In fact, only will get worse. This is a serious problem that can

not be left unchecked. If this is not addressed it will only lead to the decay

of our society. We must take action to combat gangs in a new way. Vice

President Albert Gore recently told the White House press corps, “Gangs have

been a major cause of the growth in violent crime in the past decade.” He cited

a Treasury Department report that found the presence of rival gangs, the Bloods

and the Crips, in 35 states and 58 cities across the country. At the same press

conference, Attorney General Janet Reno cited the impact of disabling one gang

in New Haven, Connecticut. Eighteen members of the “Jungleboy” street gang were

put in jail, and, according to Reno, New Haven’s murder rate fell by one-third

in 1993.

I. Outline of Need Arguments

A. Problem: Many highly rated experts warn of the impending youth crime crisis.

Youth violent crime has been rising dramatically for more than a decade. An

upward surge in youthful perpetrators of violence is complemented by an

unprecedented growth in youth living with little or no adult supervision.

Professor Dean Rojek, a sociologist at the University of Georgia, says, “For

decades violent crime was driven mostly by adults, with kids involved mostly in

property crime…. What’s been changing is that you have juveniles becoming much

more involved in violent offenses, with the use of weapons. If we add to this

more babies, you could have a multiplier effect… a mini explosion [in violent

crime by youth].” Gang’s only heighten this problem.

California authorities describe the youth gang as a “violent and

insidious new form of organized crime. Heavily armed with sophisticated weapons,

(gangs) are involved in drug trafficking, witness intimidation, extortion, and

bloody territorial wars. In some cases they are traveling out of state to spread

their violence and crime.”

According to the FBI, “The fastest growing murder circumstance is

juvenile gang killings.” Almost one-third of Los Angeles’ homicides are gang

related. Nationwide, the rate of violent offenses by gang members is three times

as high as for non-gang delinquents.

“Unless we act now,” says Attorney General Janet Reno, “to stop young

people from choosing a life of violence and crime, the beginning of the 21st

century could bring levels of violent crime to our communities that far exceed

what we have experienced.” Reggie Walton, a Washington, D.C. Superior Court

judge who handles juvenile cases, blames it on the disappearance of fathers.

Walton says fathers leave children to be raised by young mothers who themselves

are often struggling with mental or emotional problems, limited education,

poverty and addiction. Walton labels these children “walking time bombs.”

This time bomb has been in the making for some time. Today, and

historically, young males commit far more crimes than other age groups.

Teenagers commit the largest portion of all crime in America. More than one-

third of all murders are committed by offenders under the age of twenty one.

More murders and robberies are committed by eight-teen year old males than any

other group. (Paul McNulty, ?Natural Born Killers? Preventing the Coming of

Explosion of Teenage Crime?, 1995)

No matter the type of gang, most gang members are male. A Chicago study

of four police districts found that only 2 to 5 percent of gang arrested were

female. These females are typically auxiliary gang members.

Gang members range in age from 8 to 22 years old, but there are

exceptions where tenure is often well beyond 22 to perhaps more than 40 years

old. A counselor in a juvenile detention facility in California said: “(If) you

find a gang member who comes from a complete nuclear family, a kid who has never

been exposed to any kind of abuse, I’d like to meet him…. a real ‘gangbanger’

who comes from a happy, balanced home, who’s got a good opinion of himself. I

don’t think that kid exists.”

Sydney Harris, a nationally syndicated columnist, said, “Gang members

tend to be chronic losers, who can accomplish nothing individually, or who live

in so depressed an environment that only by banding together can they exercise

any influence over their lives. In both cases, they are as much to be pitied as

condemned.”

B. Significance: Young males belonging to a gang have been proved to be much

more violent than non-gang members:

Orange County, California probation statistics indicate that gang-

related youth had significantly higher law-violation rates (55.1

percent) than non-gang affiliated youth (26.4 percent). A study of

20 years of data collected by Philadelphia’s police gang unit shows that “gangs

engage in more violent behavior than do delinquent non-gang groups.”

A study in Wisconsin found that most violent crimes by youths were

committed by groups of three or more. This “pack” behavior, not

surprisingly, seems to be at the core of much of the rise in youth crime.

A study of New York City teenage gunshot victims found that 40 percent

were shot during school hours. Another study found that of

children and teenagers wounded in drive-by shootings in Los Angeles, 71

percent were “documented members of street gangs.”

Not only do gang members tend to be more violent than non-gang members,

but gang membership appears to prolong one’s criminal career. One study found

that a “large portion of persistent and dangerous juvenile gang offenders become

even more serious adult offenders.” Another study in California found that

previously-incarcerated gang members continued their lives of crime after being

released.

Gangs are spreading across the country and are not just limited to major

cities. Bernard Friedlander, a University of Hartford psychology professor and a

violence expert, says, “This is an American problem, not an inner-city

problem…. It’s spreading slowly…. On one level it’s simple fad imitation…

but on another level the isolation of youth is just as profound in some of the

more stable areas as in the inner city.”

The spread of gangs can be attributed to at least three factors. First,

parents, desiring to protect their gang-culture-saturated children from the

hometown gang’s influence, send them to relatives across the country. Sometimes

this strategy works. But many times this back fires and helps transplant the

gang culture into a new community.

The drug trade has created entrepreneurial gangs which fan out across

the country to expand their markets. Franchises of the Bloods and the Crips are

now in most metropolitan centers. With their expansion, they have introduced

collateral, gang-like violence, reminiscent of the Mob earlier in the century.

To an extent the entertainment industry contributes to the spread of

gangs. The gang culture, value system and mentality are sprinkled across the

country through movies and “gangsta” rap music. These cultural amplifiers

educate young audiences to gang values and attitudes. They denigrate women,

promote exaggerated manhood or “machismo,” and glorify violence. They also pass

on gang language, symbols, activities, and traditions.

According to Justice Department estimates, the United States has some

1,436 gangs and 120,636 gang members. They exist in all size communities and in

rural areas. The Justice Department figures are disputed by the National School

Safety Center, which in 1993 estimated that the Los Angeles area alone has at

least 959 gangs with approximately 125,000 gang members.

There are many types of gangs. Some are black, white, Asian, Hispanic or

other ethnic-centered gangs. Others are structured around territory, commercial

activities, corporate businesses, political agendas, religion, music and special

types of crime.

Race/ethnic-based gangs: Larry Rawles, deputy director of Philadelphia’s

Crisis Intervention Network, says, “When any ethnic group was at the

bottom, they formed gangs — the Jews, the Irish, the Italians.”

Gangs offered status, a sense of self-worth, and protection. Today, most

gangs are racially segregated (54.6 percent are African American and

32.6 percent are Hispanic). Blacks and Hispanics constitute the largest

numbers of youths arrested for gang offenses today.

The all-black rival gangs, the Crips and the Bloods, have an

estimated 70,000 members in Los Angeles County alone. They have

franchises in most states and metropolitan communities where they tend

to dominate the crack cocaine trade.

Darlyne Pettinicchio, a probation officer in Orange County,

California, says, “(White gangs are) punk rockers and heavy

metalers (who) come from all socio-economic classes. They’re of

average intelligence and they’re capable youngsters. They have very little

parental authority. They’re usually angry. Their dance is violent.

Their music is violent. Their behavior is violent. They’re into

anarchy.”

Economic-based gangs: Some gangs are organized around a commercial

activity. Members may be all from a single race or the same

neighborhood or they may be very diverse. The glue that holds them

together is making money. They often see themselves as Robin Hoods or

Bonnie-and-Clyde types who practice their own version of free enterprise. A

close cousin is the corporate gang, which selects a type of industry or

business and dominates the field through intimidation and violence.

Territorial gangs: can be from any race or ethnic background. They lay

claim to a particular territory. They typically “tag” their territory

with gang graffiti and are willing to defend their turf to the death.

Professor Cornel West, a Princeton University social scholar, says in

his book Race Matters “The frightening result is a numbing detachment from

others and a self-destructive disposition toward the world. Life without meaning,

hope, and love breeds a cold-hearted, mean-spirited outlook that destroys both

the individual and others.”

The youth gang satisfies a void. It provides the child a sense of

identity, belonging, power, and protection. The gang satisfies the child’s

desire to feel secure. Living in a high-risk environment without paternal

protection, the young gangster satisfies his insecurities by aligning himself

with a gang, his surrogate family. The gang provides a protective barrier

against the outside forces. One gang member says, “Being in a gang means if I

didn’t have no family, I think that’s where I’ll be. If I didn’t have no job

that’s where I’d be. To me it’s community help without all the community.

They’ll understand better than my mother and father.”

This new “family” has a distinct set of values that affect every aspect

of his life. According to the Los Angeles District Attorney, “It confronts and

confounds adult authority on every level — sex, work, power, love, education,

language, dress, music, drugs, alcohol, violence. As icons of popular culture,

gangs not only represent a powerful group identity utterly inaccessible to

adults, they are surrounded with an appealing aura of outlaw danger.”

“Tagging” their territory with gang graffiti is common. It proclaims the

presence of the gang and offers a challenge to rivals. It may claim credit for a

crime. The denser the graffiti, the closer one is to the gang’s core territory.

The Crips often mark “B/K” for “Bloods killers.”

The gang problem is obviously a enormous one for Americas youth and must be

dealt with swiftly and effectively. My partner Tom will detail our plan later on

in this debate.

II. Outline of Plan

A. Program:

This program will detail ways of preventing some gang violence. No plan

or program could ever get rid of the gang problem as a whole. Our plan is

primarily focused on prevention but also includes some stricter laws as a

deterrent to others. Our aim is to significantly decrease the gang problem in

America.

1.Higher mandatory school enrollment age:

Higher the age a child can legally withdraw from school to the age of 18.

This would make sure all children had a better education. It would also keep

many involved in school and off the streets, with out as much time to commit to

criminal behavior. Preventing ?drop out’s? from causing trouble often related

to gangs. A exception to this law would be made for any High School or GED

graduate.

Cost: NONE; funding for these students is already in place

Enforcement: $50 fine for any illegal absence

2.More ?Real World? training in High Schools:

Make vocational and other job specific classes more available. Not all

teens can or want to, go to Higher Education. If they had a career path right

out of High School many would not join gangs for economic reasons. Computer and

other high tech training will be available and well as the traditional

Automotive, Construction, ect.

Cost: Federal Government will not build one Stealth B-1 bomber

plane ($1.1 billion). Funds will be diverted to local school districts with

the most need for equipment.

Enforcement:All federal funding of schools will be revoked from any

non compling local jurisdictions

3. National Curfue Law:

A 12:00 midnight to 5:00AM national curfew for all persons under the age

of 18. Exceptions would be made if the child was with a legal gardein or some

one over the age of 25. This has been very successful in reducing crime some

localities.

Cost:NONE

Enforcement:Any law enforcement officer can issue a (maximum $75

minimum $20) citation during regular patrol.

4. Expand the Drug Free School Zone Program:

Not only would drug penalties be doubled within a 1000 yard radius of

any school but also any crime that could be linked to gang activity the penalty

would also be doubled. From a illegally parked car to murder, all punishments

doubled for known gang members.

Cost: Funded via. sin taxes on items such as alcohol and

tobacco. Money would pay for extra patrols of school areas and added jail

time for those convicted.

Enforcement:Double punishment for any illegal activities that could

be related to gang activities. Quadruple penalties for any gang members

committing a drug related crime in those areas.

5. ?Drive by’s? act of terrorism:

By labeling thing such as ?drive by? shootings, or any violence directed

at the public in general, an act of terrorism they would be a federal offense

punishable by death. Committing a federal offense normally carries a much

higher sentence than that of local jurisdictions, and is punishable by death no

matter what state the crime was done in.

Cost: Negligible

Enforcement:Punishable by Death (Capital Offense); Mandatory life in

prison for any adult involved. Juvenile Mandatory 50 years.

6. Expand programs such as Head Start:

Expand pre-kindergarden programs such as Head Start to be avalible for

all, just like public school. Will give millions of children, 2 and up, a

preschool program who parents previously could not afford. Also lets parents go

to work and get off welfare programs.

Cost: The cost of the school would be offset by the amount of

single parents being able to go back to work and therefor not relying of

welfare and food stamps.

Enforcement:NONE

B. Solvency:

Individual programs such as Head Start, Curfew, Real World Training, and

Drug Free School zones, have all ready proved there worthiness. Either by

already partially implementation around the country or full implementation in

select cities and proven to work.

New ideas such as Drive By’s a terrorist act, and increasing the legal

age to leave school are both very workable ideas but have not to my knowledge

been tested in any fashion. These two programs need to be tested for say 1 year

before being implementing for the entire county.

C. Advantages:

While none of these six plans would do much to curb violent gangs alone,

all of them at the same time should make a noticed difference. Also side

benefits of my plan are:

Free preschool for all children older than 2 years of age

Allows single parents to work

Decreases gang and drug activity outside our schools

Gets tough with the most violent gang members

Encourages kids to stay in school

Better job training is offered for High Schoolers

III. Conclusion

“We’ve got so many kids out there who’ve lost hope, who believe in only

living for today,” says John Turner, chief of police for the city of Mountlake

Terrace, Washington. “They join a gang and get involved in criminal activity

because there aren’t any people taking them by the hand in simple terms and

pointing them in the right direction, giving them self-esteem and positive

feedback.”

Perhaps gangs exist because modern society has failed to harness the

male hunter/predator instinct and converted those energies to familial

provider/protector efforts. Delinquent young people lacking values, conscience

or a sense of remorse can easily find themselves drawn to the gang lifestyle.

Noted author James Q. Wilson writes in The Moral Sense that modern

society with its “rapid technological change, intense division of labor, and

ambiguous allocation of social roles, frequently leaves some men out, with their

aggressive pre dispositions either uncontrolled or undirected. Gangs are one

result.” Wilson says the profits from illegal drug sales provide gang members

economic opportunities which combine with their uncontrolled aggression to

develop a “warrior culture that under invests in family life.”

Converting male energy to familial provider/protector efforts has always

been the task of the intact family. But the nuclear family is declining,

especially in predominantly black inner cities where gangs dominate life and

rain violent crime. Many of these children join gangs to find purpose, security,

and self-esteem. The gang culture gives them a sense of belonging and remakes

their value system. Partying, fighting, and vicious gang loyalty become their

primary values, thus pushing aside virtues that favor family life. This is a

vicious cycle and it must be broken.

Given that youth gangs account for a disproportionate share of youth

violence, their potential for contributing to a future crime wave is enormous. A

recent decline in violent crime appears to be more a result of fewer teenagers

than better law enforcement. When the current bumper crop of elementary-age

children become adolescents, the violent crime rate is likely to explode.

Gangs are the powder magazine, they must be dealt with before the bomb

goes off.

Rebuttal extensions-

Population of 14-18 year olds

Now 17,620,472 5 Years18,628,635 + 6 % 10 Years

20,284,601+ 15%