Earthquakes Essay Research Paper A Discussion On

Earthquakes Essay, Research Paper

A Discussion On Earthquakes

Perhaps Mother Nature offers no greater force than that of the earthquake.

Across the span of time, earthquakes have been recorded for their incredible

destructive forces, and their abilities to awe mankind with their unparalleled

force. Earthquakes can often strike without any notice, leveling large cities

and killing scores of innocent people. Not only can earthquakes bring harm to

society through these methods of destruction, but they can also cause millions

of dollars worth of damage to the areas they destroy, causing economic chaos.

An earthquake is a natural phenomenon, occurring throughout the history of the

world. Descriptions as old as recorded history show the significant effects

earthquakes have had on people’s lives. Long before there were scientific

theories for the cause of earthquakes, people around the world created folklore

to explain them. Until recent times, science has not had a complete

understanding of how earthquakes are caused, and what can be done to predict

when they will strike. This essay will discuss how earthquakes are formed and

occur, how scientists can more accurately predict the arrival of earthquakes.

Before contemplating how earthquakes might possibly be prevented, it is

essential that the process and formation of and earthquake be understood.

Earthquakes are caused when the earth’s crustal plates move, rub, or push

against each other. The earth’s crust (the outer layer of the earth) is made up

of seven major plates and approximately thirteen smaller ones. The name plate

is used to describe these portions of the earth’s crust because they are

literally ?plates? or sections, composed of dirt and rock. These plates float

on molten lava, called magma. Since the plates are floating on magma, they can

slowly move. The place where friction occurs between plates is called a fault.

A fault is a crack in a plate or a place where two or more plates meet. An

example of a fault where two plates meet is the San Andrea’s fault in California,

where the Pacific and North American plates meet. The plates are about 30

miles thick under land and can be one to five miles thick beneath the ocean.

The plates move because of convection currents. Magma has currents like the

ocean does, that move in a circular motion beneath the plates. When two plates

are pushing against each other, they are constantly building up tension on the

fault. When two plates finally slip, they release a great amount of energy in

the form of shock waves. These shock waves cause vibrations, which in turn

cause the ground around the fault line to move and shake. This phenomenon is

know as an earthquake.

Because of the incredible destructive capabilities of earthquakes,

scientists are constantly trying to devise ways to ensure their early detection.

Earth scientists have begun to forecast damaging earthquakes in California.

Although quake forecasting is still maturing, it is now reliable enough to make

official earthquake warnings possible. These warnings help government, industry,

and private citizens prepare for large earthquakes and conduct rescue and

recovery efforts in the aftermath of destructive shocks. In recent years,

earthquake forecasting has advanced from a research frontier to an emerging

science. This science is now being applied in quake-plagued California, where

shocks are closely monitored and have been studied for many years. Earthquake

forecasts declare that a temblor has a certain probability of occurring within a

given time, not that one will definitely strike. In this way they are similar

to weather forecasts. Scientists are able to make earthquake forecasts because

quakes tend to occur in clusters that strike the same area within a limited time

period. The largest quake in a cluster is called the mainshock, those before it

are called foreshocks, and those after it are called aftershocks.

In any cluster, most quakes are aftershocks. Most aftershocks are too

small to cause damage, but following a large mainshock one or more may be

powerful. Such strong aftershocks can cause additional damage and casualties in

areas already devastated by a mainshock, and also threaten the lives of rescuers

searching for the injured. In the first few weeks after the 1994 magnitude 6.7

Northridge, California, earthquake, more than 3,000 aftershocks occurred. One

magnitude 5.2 aftershock caused $7 million in damage just in electric utility

equipment in the Los Angeles area alone. The U. S. Geological Survey (USGS)

first began forecasting aftershocks following the 1989 magnitude 7.1 Loma Prieta,

California, earthquake. By studying previous earthquakes, scientists had

detected patterns in the way aftershocks decrease in number and magnitude with

time. With such knowledge, scientists can estimate the daily odds for the

occurrence of damaging aftershocks following large California temblors. These

forecasts are relayed directly to the California Office of Emergency Services

(OES) as well as to the public.

Some of the more larger earthquakes are preceded by foreshocks.

Knowledge of past earthquake patterns allows scientists to estimate the odds

that an earthquake striking today is a foreshock and will soon be followed by a

larger mainshock in the same area. These odds depend on the earthquake’s

magnitude and the same seismic history of the fault on which it occurred. When

a moderate earthquake hits California, scientists immediately estimate the

probability that a damaging mainshcck will follow. If the threat is significant,

a warning is issued. This warning process was put into action in June, 1988

when a magnitude 5.1 shock–one of the largest in the San Francisco Bay region

since the great 1906 earthquake–struck 60 miles south of San Francisco.

Alerted by the USGS that there was a 1 in 20 chance of a larger earthquake in

the next five days, the California OES issued an advisory to warn the public.

(The usual daily odds of a large earthquake in the Bay region are 1 in 15,000.)

The warning period passed without further activity. In August, 1989, another

earthquake hit the same area and a similar advisory was issued. Again nothing

happened in the specified warning period. However, 69 days later, the area was

rocked by the magnitude 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake, which killed 63 people and

caused $6 billion of damage in the San Francisco Bay region.

The lessons learned from these observations have already enabled earth

scientists and emergency response officials to build a framework within which

they communicate rapidly and effectively. Based on this experience, similar

alert plans have been devised for geologic hazards in other areas of the United

States. The development of modern seismic monitoring networks and the knowledge

gained from past shocks, earthquake forecasts and warnings are now a reality.

Continued effective communication of these forecasts to the public will help

reduce the loss of life and property in future earthquakes.

In conclusion, earthquakes are a powerful force of nature. Although

these destructive giants are indeed deadly, scientists are continually utilizing

research data collected from previous earthquakes and observations, so that a

more effective and efficient warning system may be put in place. Because of

these scientist’s work, society benefits from this advanced knowledge of when an

earthquake will most probably strike. With the continued study of collected

data, perhaps one day their will be a warning system that will be able to give

enough advanced notice, so that casualties might be minimized even further.