Ru.7 Page of UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGEDEPARTMENT OF SLAVONIC STUDIESPAPER Ru.7: RUSSIA IN REVOLUTION 1861-1917HANDBOOKMembers of the Imperial family in 1913 Chris Ward cew23@cam.ac.uk INTRODUCTIONcourse aims The course is designed to provide you with a thorough grounding in and advanced understanding of Russia’s social, political and economic history in the period under review and to prepare you for the exam. before the course starts You’ll need some knowledge of European and Russian history so read the following before the course starts: Anderson, P. ^ Lineages of the Absolutist State (2nd ed., 1979). Hobsbawm, E. J. The Age of Empire 1875-1914 (1988). Stone, N. Europe Transformed 1878-1919 (1983) Westwood, J. Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812-1917 (4th ed., 1993) ^ Briefing meeting: There’ll be a meeting at 12.00 on the Wedenesday before the first teaching day of Michaelmas. Check with the departmental secretary for the venue. It’s essential that you attend and bring this handbook with you. course structure^ The course comprises three elements: lectures, supervisions and reading. Lectures: you’ll have sixteen lectures, eight in Michaelmas and eight in Lent. The lectures provide an introduction to and overview of the course, but no more. It’s important to understand that the lectures alone won’t enable you to cover the course, nor will they by themselves prepare you for the exam. They’re not a substitute for reading, only a supplement to reading.Supervisions: you’ll have ten supervisions, four in Michaelmas, four in Lent and two in Easter.Reading: to study history is, primarily, to read, so reading is the most important aspect of the course. ^ You must understand from the outset that this is primarily a reading course and that, above all, you’ll need to commit to reading extensively and consistently. That’s why the bulk of the handbook is devoted to providing you with detailed guidance on reading. using the handbook^ The handbook is divided into five sections: Section 1 the exam Section 2 lectures Section 3 supervisions Section 4 reading Section 5 primary sourcesCheck each section carefully so you understand the course structure and timetable and exactly what’s expected of you.^ SECTION 1: THE EXAMdescriptionThe exam paper is divided into three sections and you answer one question from each section. All questions have equal weight.Section A deals with the course’s four primary sources. There are always four questions, one on each source.Section B has at least six questions. Most cover the period 1860 to c.1904 but there’ll sometimes be one or two questions of a general nature covering the whole period of the paper.Section C has at least six questions. Most cover the period c.1904 to 1917 but, as in section B, there’ll sometimes be one or two questions of a general nature covering the whole period of the paper.preparing for the examSection A is predictable because you can choose in advance which primary source you want to concentrate on in the knowledge that it will always come up on the paper. You should study the sources (section 5) as part of your specialist reading (section 4.2) and we’ll look at them in detail in Lent and Easter (section 3).Sections B&C are periodized (with the occasional general question included in each), but you’ll be asked to respond to problems and issues within periods, not simply to periods. You should note that there’s no guarantee that a particular problem or issue will always come up in sections B&C, or that problems or issues won’t be conflated. This means that you can’t ‘topic spot’ by focussing your work on a narrow aspect of the course – mugging up a couple of problems or issues and hoping they’ll see you through, for instance. You’ll have to do the whole course in order to be prepared for the exam. On the other hand you won’t be asked to respond to anything outside the course aims.You should look at some past papers to get a feel for the style of questions.^ SECTION 2: LECTURESUnless otherwise indicated all lectures are on Tuesdays at 12.00 and last for one hour. Check with the departmental secretary for venues.michaelmas1 Introduction to the course Reforming the system c.1860-702 Revolution from above I: The end of serfdom3 Revolution from above II: Controlling societyModernization and the state c.1870-19044 Revolution from above III: Industrialization5 Reaction in modernization: Aleksandr III and Nikolai IIModernization and society c.1870-19046 Old wine into new bottles: крестьянство and дворянство7 The fractured class: Workers8 The missing class: The bourgeoisielent Modernization and revolution c.1870-19049 Heroic society: народничество and terror10 Claiming the future: Marxism and socialism11 Autocracy as anachronism?: Economic and political crisis^ The Duma Monarchy and its problems c.1905-1412 1905-6: Bourgeois revolution?12 1907-14: Stolypin’s gamble Russia in Revolution c.1914-1714 Russia and world war: 1914-1615 On the eve of Revolution?: 1914-1616 Petrograd and the end of autocracy: February 1917^ SECTION 3: SUPERVISIONSThese will take the form of five large group sessions (seminars) and five small group supervisions. Seminars last for between one and a half hours, supervisions for one hour.michaelmas1 Seminar: Researching and writing history (8 October 17.00 RFB room 146) How to analyse, research and respond to essay and discussion sessions and exam questions. No preparation necessary.^ 2 Essay supervision (tba at Briefing Meeting) Choose a question from any topic from the Michaelmas list (p.6). You can do any question you like from within a topic but make sure your supervision partners do the same topic as you. Preparation: aim at five to six sides of typed A4; research using the general and topic-related reading in the reading lists; cite quotations by footnoting; end with a full bibliography. You must give me your essays at the lecture prior to your supervision. Please note that I won’t be able to read or mark late work.^ 3 Discussion supervision (tba at Briefing Meeting) Choose a question from any topic from the Michaelmas list (apart from the topic you’ve covered in 2). You can do any question you like from within a topic but make sure your supervision partners do the same topic as you. Preparation: as for 2 or instead of writing come prepared for a discussion, i.e., with notes detailing problems and issues, and sketches of possible responses to the question.4 Seminar: State and society c.1860-1904 (1 December 17.00 RFB room 146) Review of Michaelmas term’s work. Preparation: be ready to raise problems and issues; two or three lead off the seminar, possibly by reference to essay questions.lent5 Seminar: Primary sources 5.1 & 5.2 (19 Jan 17.00 RFB room 327) Close analysis of the sources. What use are they to historians? What do they tell us and what don’t they tell us? Preparation: be ready to raise problems and issues; two or three of you lead off the seminar by reference to the sources.6 Essay supervision (tba at end of Michaelmas) As for 2, except choose from the Lent list (p.7).7 Discussion supervision (tba at end of Michaelmas) As for 3, except choose from the Lent list.8 Seminar: Politics and war c.1870-1917 (9 March 17.00 RFB room 327) As for 4, except Lent term’s work.easter9 Seminar: Primary sources 5.3 & 5.4 (27 April 17.00 RFB room 327) As for 5.10 Revision supervision (tba at end of Lent) Choose a question from either list or from a past paper and write an essay under exam conditions.michaelmas list_______________________________________________________________________Topic I1 ‘After 1861 classes began to replace сословия, but the social system remained unchanged.’ Discuss.2 ‘Class relations were fracturing the “peasant mode of production” in post-emancipation Russia.’ Discuss.3 ‘The concept of “class” is the key to the understanding of the socio-economic realities of Russia in the period 1861-1904.’ Discuss.4 ‘Post-emancipation Russia was feudal.’ Discuss._______________________________________________________________________Topic II5 ‘The reforms which followed the emancipation of the serfs were ill-conceived and, by 1904, fatal to the autocracy.’ Discuss.6 ‘Гласность and reform pointed ineluctably towards terror and assassination.’ Discuss with reference to the period 1864-1881.7 ‘By eschewing change Aleksandr III guaranteed stability.’ Discuss.8 ‘Aleksandr III turned Russia into a “well-ordered police state”.’ Discuss._______________________________________________________________________^ Topic III9 ‘The state needed the peasantry but the peasantry did not need the state.’ Discuss with reference to the period 1861-1904.10 ‘A bourgeois-democratic polity failed to develop in late nineteenth-century Russia because of the timidity of the bourgeoisie.’ Discuss.11 Assess the significance of ANY TWO of the following: (a) G. V. Plekhanov; (b) M. T. Loris-Melikov; (c) V. K. von Plehve; (d) K. P. Pobedonostev.12 Discuss the usefulness to historians of ONE of the following sources:(a) ^ Программа исполнительного комитета партии «Народной воли» and Письмо исполнительного комитета партии «Народной воли» к Александру III. (b) Выставка русской промышленности 1896 г. and С. Ю. Витте, О положении русской промышленности._______________________________________________________________________lent list_______________________________________________________________________Topic IV13 ‘Russian social democracy was predicated on a misunderstanding of the country’s socio-economic structures.’ Discuss with reference to the period up to 1914.14 ‘There is little evidence of a “developing revolutionary situation” in the Russian Empire in the decade before 1904.’ Discuss.15 ‘By 1904 urbanization was the main threat to the autocracy.’ Discuss.16 ‘War is the locomotive of history.’ Discuss this aphorism with reference to Russia in the period 1861-1905._______________________________________________________________________Topic V17 Account for the Revolution of 1905.18 Consider the view that the major problem confronting the Duma Monarchy was the failure of Russian capitalism.19 Assess the significance of the career of P. A. Stolypin.20 ‘The state’s economic policies served only to produce a disgruntled peasantry and a revolutionary working class.’ Discuss with reference to the period 1905 to 1914._______________________________________________________________________Topic VI21 ‘The wires of democracy cannot stand too high a voltage’ (Trotskii). Consider the period October 1905 to February 1917 in the light of this statement.22 ‘By late 1916 the tsarist regime appeared to have overcome the crises engendered by war.’ Discuss.23 Compare and contrast the revolutions of 1905 and February 1917.24 Discuss the usefulness to historians of ONE of the following sources:(a) ^ Манифест об усовершенствовании государственного порядка (Манифест 17 Октября 1905 г.) and С. Ю. Витте, Письмо о Манифесте 17 Октября 1905 г. (b) Доклад начальника Петербургского охранного отделения Министру Внутренних Дел о ходе массовой забастовки в Петербурге в июле 1914 г. _______________________________________________________________________^ SECTION 4: READINGlocationsHardcopy Many books and articles are in our MML library. Many, however, aren’t in our library and very few will be in your college libraries, so you must get used to using the Seeley Library (in the History Faculty next to the Law building) and Marshall Library (in the Economics Faculty beside the Buttery) as well as the UL. Note that early volumes of Slavic Review may be catalogued as American Slavic Review.Online JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org/) is an excellent site for journal articles. For a wonderful site on Marxism, Russian revolutionaries and a host of revolutionary and radical figures in general see (http://www.marxists.org/). If you come across other good sites let me know. Avoid popular sites like Wikipedia – they are full of inaccurate rubbish.organization of the reading list4.1 General works are listed in rough chronological/thematic order. Of course you can’t possible read them all, nor are you expected to. They are for you to consult as necessary throughout the course. An invaluable work, which you should get to know and will often find useful on a given topic before you read anything else, is Wieczynski, J. L., ed., ^ The Modern Encyclopaedia of Russian and Soviet History (multi-volume 1976 onwards). It’s commonly known as MERSH and is on reference in our library.4.2 Specialist reading is listed under each lecture heading. Don’t do any specialist reading until you’ve consulted a few general works. Again, you’re not expected to read everything. The lists are to guide you to a range of texts when you need to deepen your knowledge of a particular topic.^ 4.1 GENERAL WORKSStandard works: Florinsky, M. Russia: A History and Interpretation (2 vols., 1970).Kappeler, A. The Russian Empire: A Multiethnic History (2001). Pipes, R. Russia under the Old Regime (1974). Riasanovsky, N. V. A History of Russia (4th ed., 1984). Rogger, H. Russia in the Age of Modernization and Revolution 1881-1917 (1983). Saunders, D. Russia in the Age of Reaction and Reform 1801-1881 (1992). Seton-Watson, H. ^ The Russian Empire 1801-1917 (1967). Thaden, E. C. Russia Since 1801: The Making of a New Society (1971). Vernadsky, G. A History of Russia (5 vols., 1943-69).Biography: Carrère d’Encausse, H. Nicholas II: The Interrupted Transition (2000). Ferro, M. Nicholas II: The Last of the Tsars (1991). Lieven, D. Nicholas II: Twilight of the Empire (1996).Duma Monarchy & Revolutions:Acton, E., Cherniaev, V. & Rosenberg, W., eds. ^ Critical Companion to the Russian Revolution 1914-1921 (1997). Ascher, A. P. A. Stolypin: The Search for Stability in Late Imperial Russia (2001). _____ The Revolution of 1905 (1988). Stockdale, M. K. Paul Miliukov and the Quest for a Liberal Russia 1880-1918 (1996). Surh, G. St Petersburg in 1905: Labor, Society and Revolution (1989). Waldron, P. Between Two Revolutions: Stolypin and the Politics of Renewal in Russia (1997).^ Economy and society: Black, C. E. The Modernization of Japan and Russia: A Comparative Study (1985). Blum, J. Lord and Peasant in Russia from the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century (1961). Crisp, O. Studies in the Russian Economy Before 1914 (1976). Ely, C. ^ This Meagre Nature: Landscape and National Identity in Imperial Russia (2002). Falkus, M. The Industrialization of Russia 1700-1914 (1972). Gatrell, P. The Tsarist Economy 1850-1917 (1986). Hutton, M. J. Russian and West European Women 1860-1939: Dreams, Struggles and Nightmares (2001). Lyashchenko, P. I. ^ History of the National Economy of Russia to 1917 (1949). Moon, D. ‘Reassessing Russian serfdom’, European History Quarterly (4, 1996). _____ The Russian Peasantry 1600-1930: The World the Peasants Made (1999). Rieber, A. J. Merchants and Entrepreneurs in Imperial Russia (1982). Robinson, G. T. Rural Russia under the Old Regime (1932). Roosevelt, P. ^ Life on the Russian Country Estate: A Social and Cultural History (1995). Venturi, F. Roots of Revolution (1960). Wirtschafter, E. K. Social Identity in Imperial Russia (1997). Yaney, G. L. The Urge to Mobilize: Agrarian Reform in Russia 1861-1930 (1982).^ Government and society: Brooks, J. When Russia Learned to Read: Literacy and Popular Literature 1861-1917 (1985). Freeze, G. L. The Parish Clergy in Nineteenth-Century Russia: Crisis, Reform and Counter-Reform (1983). _____ ‘The soslovie (estate) paradigm and Russian social history’, ^ American Historical Review (1, 1986). Geyer, D. Russian Imperialism: the Interaction of Domestic and Foreign Policy, 1860-1914 (1987). Keep, J. H. L. Soldiers of the Tsar: Army and Society in Russia 1462-1874 (1985). Kucherov, S. Courts, Lawyers and Trials under the Last Three Tsars (1953). Lincoln, W. B. ^ The Great Reforms: Autocracy, Bureaucracy and the Politics of Change in Imperial Russia (1990).McCauley, M. & Walden, P. The Emergence of the Modern Russian State 1855-61 (1988). Manning, R. T. The Crisis of the Old Order in Russia: Gentry and Government (1982). Orlovsky, D. T. The Limits of Reform. The Ministry of Internal Affairs in Imperial Russia 1801-1881 (1981). Pearson, T. S. ^ Russian Officialdom in Crisis: Autocracy and Local Self-Government 1861-1900 (1989). Raeff, M. Understanding Imperial Russia. State and Society in the Old Regime (1984). Starr, S. F. Decentralization and Self-Government in Russia 1830-1870 (1972). Wcislo, F. W. Reforming Rural Russia: State, Local Society, and National Policies 1855-1914 (1990). Wirtschafter, E. K. ^ From Serf to Russian Soldier (1990). Yaney, G. L. The Systematization of Russian Government: Social Evolution in the Domestic Administration of Imperial Russia 1711-1905 (1973).Ideology: Treadgold, D. W. The West in Russia and China: Religious and Secular Thought in Modern Times. Vol. I: Russia 1472-1917 (1973). Ulam, A. B. ^ Ideologies and Illusions: Revolutionary Thought from Herzen to Solzhenitsyn (1976). _____ In the Name of the People: Prophets and Conspirators in Pre-Revolutionary Russia (1977). Walicki, A. A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism (1980).^ 4.2 SPECIALIST READINGThe questions grouped under each lecture heading relate broadly to the kind of issues historians are interested in, so you should keep them in mind when you’re reading.Lecture 1: Introduction to the courseWhat were the main features of Russian government in the mid-nineteenth century? Can the Romanovs be described as absolute monarchs? Was the autocracy a part of a ‘feudal’ system of social relationships?On the structure of Russian history see: Blackwell, W. L. ‘Modernization and urbanization in Russia: a comparative view’, in Hamm, M. F., ed., ^ The City in Russian History (1976). Hellie, R. ‘The structure of modern Russian history: towards a dynamic model’ [and rejoinders by Kleimola, Cracraft, Wortman], Russian History (1, 1977). Tipps, D. C. ‘Modernization theory and the study of national societies: a critical perspective’, ^ Comparative Studies in Society and History (15, 1973).On government and society see: Bennett, H. A. ‘Evolution in the meaning of chin: an introduction to the Russian institution of rank ordering and niche assignment from the time of Peter the Great’s Table of Ranks to the Bolshevik Revolution’, ^ California Slavic Studies (10, 1977). Black, C. E. The Dynamics of Modernization (1966) ch.1. Freeze, G. L. ‘Handmaiden of the state? The Church in Imperial Russia reconsidered’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History (1, 1985). Kahan, A. ‘Notes on serfdom in Eastern and Western Europe’, ^ Journal of Economic History (1, 1973).Kipp, W. & ‘Autocracy and reform: bureaucratic absolutism and political modernization in Lincoln, W. B. nineteenth-century Russia’, Russian History (1, 1979). Okenfus, M. J. ‘From school class to social caste: the divisiveness of early modern Russian education’, ^ Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas (33, 1985). Perrie, M. ‘Folklore as evidence of peasant mentalité: social attitudes and values in Russian popular culture’, Russian Review (2, 1989). Raeff, M. ‘The bureaucratic phenomena of Imperial Russia 1700-1905’, ^ American Historical Review (4, 1979).Reforming the system c.1860-70Lecture 2: Revolution from above I: The end of serfdomWhy did Aleksandr decide to abolish serfdom? How was abolition organized? What form did it take? What were the immediate gains and losses for the various groups involved in the process? Was the principle of autocracy compromised?Moon, D. ^ The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia, 1762-1907 (2001).On the state see: Emmons, T., ed. The Emancipation of the Russian Serfs (1970). Lincoln, W. B. In the Vanguard of Reform: Russia’s Enlightened Bureaucracy 1825-1861 (1982) chs.4-6. Mosse, A. ^ Alexander II and the Modernization of Russia (1958). Pereria, N. G. O. ‘Alexander II and the decision to emancipate the Russian serfs’, Canadian Slavonic Papers (1, 1980). Rieber, A. ‘Alexander II: a revisionist view’, Journal of Modern History (43, 1971). Zaionchkovskii, P. A. The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia (1978) chs.1-3, conclusion.On the dvorianstvo see: Emmons, T. ^ The Russian Landed Gentry and the Peasant Emancipation of 1861 (1968) chs.3-8. Field, D. The End of Serfdom: Nobility and Bureaucracy in Russia 1855-1861 (1976) introduction, chs.1-2, conclusion. Kolchin, P. ‘In defense of servitude: American proslavery and Russia proserfdom arguments 1760-1860’, ^ American Historical Review (85, 4, 1980).On the peasantry see: Adler, C. C. ‘The “revolutionary situation” of 1859-1861’, Canadian Slavic Studies (2, 1969). Beerman, R. ‘Prerevolutionary Russian peasant laws’, in Butler, W. E., ed., ^ Russian Law: Historical and Political Perspectives (1977). Emmons, T. ‘The peasant and emancipation’, in Vucinich, W. S., ed., The Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Russia (1968). Field, D. Rebels in the Name of the Tsar (1976) ch.2. Moon, D. ‘Russian peasant volunteers at the beginning of the Crimean War’, ^ Slavic Review (4, 1992).See also: Paperno, I. ‘The liberation of the serfs as a cultural symbol’, Russian Review (4, 1991).Lecture 3: Revolution from above II: Controlling societyWhy were reforms made in the army, the legal system, local government, education and the censorship? Why was there no ‘crowning of the system’ — no constitution? What overall assessments can be made of the ‘Great Reforms’?Eklof, B., Bushnell, J., ^ Russia’s Great Reforms 1855-1881 (1994) articles by Zhakarova, Nardova, & Zakharova, L., eds. Petrov, Afanas’ev.On ‘crowning the system’ see: Malloy, J. ‘Russian liberalism and the closing of the 1867 St Petersburg zemstvo’, Canadian Slavic Studies (4, 1970). Raeff, M., ed. Plans for Political Reform in Imperial Russia (1966) ch.8.On local government see: Abbott, R. ‘Police reform in the Russian province of Iaroslavl’ 1856-1876’, ^ Slavic Review (2, 1973). Emmons, T. The Russian Landed Gentry and the Peasant Emancipation of 1861 (1968) chs.9-10. McKenzie, K. E. ‘Zemstvo organization and role within the administrative structure’, in Emmons, T. & Vucinich, W. S., eds., The Zemstvo in Russia (1982). Owen, T. C. Capitalism and Politics in Russia: A Social History of the Moscow Merchants 1855-1905 (1981) ch.4. Walkin, J. The Rise of Democracy in Pre-Revolutionary Russia (1963) ch.7.On education and censorship see: Brooks, J. ‘The zemstvo and the education of the people’, in Emmons, T. & Vucinich, W. S., eds., The Zemstvo in Russia (1982). Dodge, R. H. ‘Peasant education and zemstvo schools in Moscow province 1865-1905’, Topic (1, 1974). Eklof, B. ‘The myth of the zemstvo school’, History of Education Quarterly (4, 1984). _____ Russia’s Peasant Schools: Officialdom, Village Culture and Popular Pedagogy 1861-1914 (1986) ch.5. Miller, F. A. Dmitrii Miliutin and the Reform Era in Russia (1968) ch.4. Rudd, C. ‘The censorship law of 1865’, Canadian Slavic Studies (2, 1969). Walkin, J. The Rise of Democracy in Pre-Revolutionary Russia (1963) ch.5.On the judicial and legal systems see: Czap, P. ‘Peasant class courts and peasant customary justice in Russia 1861-1912’, ^ Journal of Social History (2, 1967). Frank, S. P. Popular justice, community and culture among the Russian peasantry 1870-1900’, Russian Review (3, 1987). Frierson, C. ‘Crime and punishment in the Russian village: rural concepts of criminality at the end of the nineteenth century’, ^ Slavic Review (1, 1987). Wortman, R. S. The Development of a Russian Legal Consciousness (1976) part 2. _____ ‘Judicial personnel and the court reform of 1864’, Canadian Slavic Studies (2, 1969).On the army see: Bushnell, J. ‘Peasants in uniform: the tsarist army and peasant society’, ^ Journal of Social History (4, 1980). _____ ‘The tsarist officer corps 1881-1914: custom, duties, inefficiency’, American Historical Review (86, 4, 1981). Curtiss, J. S. ‘The peasant and the army’, in Vucinich, W. S., ed., The Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Russia (1968). Miller, F. A. Dmitrii Miliutin and the Reform Era in Russia (1968) ch.6. Willis Brooks, E. ‘Reform in the Russian army 1856-1861’, ^ Slavic Review (1, 1984).Modernization and the state c.1870-1904Lecture 4: Revolution from above III: IndustrializationWhy did large-scale industrialization begin in the third quarter of the century? What role was played by the state? Was there an ‘industrial revolution’? Was some form of capitalism developing? What was the relationship between industrialization, the Great Reforms and Russian imperialism? Was Russian industrialization born of Western imperialism?On the policies and processes of industrialization see: Blackwell, W. L. ^ The Industrialization of Russia (1970) ch.2. Brower, D. R. The Russian City Between Tradition and Modernity 1850-1900 (1990). Carstensen, F. ‘Foreign participation in Russian economic life: notes on British enterprise 1865-1914’, in Guroff, G. & Carstensen, F., eds., ^ Entrepreneurship in Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union (1982). Ellison, H. J. ‘Economic modernization in Imperial Russia: purposes and achievements’, Journal of Economic History (25, 1965). Gatrell, P. ‘The meaning of the Great Reforms in Russian economic history’, in Eklof, B., Bushnell, J. & Zakharova, L., eds., ^ Russia’s Great Reforms 1855-1881 (1994). Gregory, P. ‘Economic growth and structural change in Tsarist Russia: a case of modern economic growth?’, Soviet Studies (3, 1971-2). Kahan, A. ‘Government policies and the industrialization of Russia’, Journal of Economic History (27, 1967). McCaffray, S. P. ‘The Association of Southern Coal and Steel Producers and the problems of industrial progress in tsarist Russia’, ^ Slavic Review (3, 1988).Milward, A. S. & The Development of the Economies of Continental Europe 1850-1914 (1977) Saul, S. B. ch.7. Portal, R. ‘The industrialization of Russia’, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (vol.6 part 2, 1965). Skerpan, A. ‘The Russian national economy and emancipation’, in Ferguson, A. & Levin, A., eds., ^ Essays in Russian History: A Collection Dedicated to George Vernadsky (1964). Sontag, S. P. ‘Tsarist debt and tsarist foreign policy’ Slavic Review (4, 1968). Thalheim, K. C. ‘Russia’s economic development’, in Katkov, G. & Oberländer, E., eds., Russia Enters the Twentieth Century 1894-1917 (1971). von Laue, T. H. Sergei Witte and the Industrialization of Russia (1963) chs.1,3,7.On the regions see: Bater, J. H. St Petersburg: Industrialization and Change (1976) chs.4-5. Bater, J. H. & Studies in Russian Historical Geography (vol.2, 1983) articles by Bater, French, R. A., eds. Blackwell. Owen, T. C. Capitalism and Politics in Russia: A Social History of the Moscow Merchants 1855-1905 (1981) chs.3,5. Poppe, N. ‘The economic and cultural development of Siberia’, in Katkov, G. & Oberländer, E., eds., ^ Russia Enters the Twentieth Century 1894-1917 (1971). Treadgold, D. W. The Great Siberian Migration: Government and Peasant Resettlement from Emancipation to the First World War (1957) part 3. industrial workers in St Petersburg’, Soviet Studies (24, 1972).Associated primary source:Выставка русской промышленности 1896 г. and С. Ю. Витте, О положении русской промышленности.^ Lecture 5: Reaction in modernization: Aleksandr III and Nikolai IIWhy did the regime lose confidence in reform? What influence did conservative thinkers have in the bureaucracy? How did the regime try to promote a conservative ideology of its own? What was the scope of the ‘counter-reforms’ and how effective were they?On the crisis of 1881-2 see: Heilbronner, H. ‘Alexander III and the reform plan of Loris-Melikov’, Journal of Modern History (33, 1961). Raeff, M., ed. Plans for Political Reform in Imperial Russia (1966) ch.9. Zaionchkovskii, P. The Russian Autocracy Under Alexander III (1976) ch.1.On central government see: Hare, R. Portraits of Russian Personalities Between Reform and Revolution (1959) ch.9. Orlovsky, D. T. ‘Recent studies of the Russian bureaucracy’, Russian Review (33, 1976). Pintner, W. M. ‘Reformability in the age of reform and counterreform’, in Crummey, R. O., ed., ^ Reform in Russia and the USSR (1989). Sorenson, T. ‘The end of the Volunteer Fleet: some evidence on the scope of Pobedonostsev’s power in Russia’, Slavic Review (1, 1975). Taranovski, T. ‘Alexander III and his bureaucracy: the limitations on autocratic power’, ^ Canadian Slavonic Papers (2-3, 1984). Whelan, H. W. Alexander III and the State Council: Bureaucracy and Counter-Reform in Late Imperial Russia (1980) part 1. Zaionchkovskii, P. The Russian Autocracy Under Alexander III (1976) chs.8-9.On local government see: Becker, S. Nobility and Privilege in Late Imperial Russia (1985) chs.3,7. Connolly, V. ‘The “nationalities question” in the last phase of tsardom’, in Katkov, G. & Oberländer, E., eds., Russia Enters the Twentieth Century (1971). Fallows, T. ‘The zemstvo and the bureaucracy 1890-1914’, in Emmons, T. & Vucinich, W. S., eds., ^ The Zemstvo in Russia (1982). Hamburg, H. ‘Portrait of an elite: Russian marshals of the nobility 1861-1917’, Slavic Review (4, 1981). Pearson, T. S. ‘The origins of Alexander III’s Land Captains: a re-interpretation’, Slavic Review (3, 1981). Wcislo, F. ‘The Land Captain reform of 1889 and the reassertion of unrestricted autocratic authority’, ^ Russian History/Histoire Russe (2-4, 1988).On conservatism and Pan-Slavism see: Adams, A. E. ‘Pobedonostsev and the rule of firmness’, Slavonic & East European Review (32, 1953). Byrnes, R. Pobedonostev: His Life and Thought. (1968) chs.8-9. Curtiss, J. S. Church and State in Russia: The Last Years of the Empire 1900-1917 (1965) ch.2. Kohn, H. Panslavism: its History and Ideology (1960) chs.2.1,2.4. Pobedonostsev, K. P. Reflections of a Russian Statesman (1898) chs.1-3. Rogger, H. ‘Reflections on Russian conservatism 1861-1905’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas (14, 1966). Thaden, E. C. Conservative Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Russia (1964) part 3. Walicki, A. The Slavophile Controversy: A History of Conservative Utopia in Nineteenth-Century Russian Thought (1975) ch.12. Weeks, T. R. ^ Nation and State in Late Imperial Russia: Nationalism and Russification on the Western Borderlands 1863-1914 (1996).Modernization and society c.1870-1904Lecture 6: Old wine into new bottles: крестьянство and дворянствоWhat long-term effect did the reforms have on the peasants and the landowners? Was the gentry in decline? Was a process of social differentiation beginning within the peasantry? Was capitalist farming developing?On the dvorianstvo see: Becker, S. ^ Nobility and Privilege in Late Imperial Russia (1985) chs.1-2. Emmons, T. ‘The Russian landed gentry and politics’, Russian Review (3, 1974). Sinel, A. A. ‘The socialization of the bureaucratic elite 1811-1917: life at the Tsarskoe Selo Lyceum and the School of Jurisprudence’, ^ Russian History (1, 1976).On the peasant economy see: Discussion On post-1861 village: Russian Review (1, 1985). Burds, J. Peasant Dreams and Market Politics: Labor Migration and the Russian Village 1861-1905 (1998). Mironov, V. ‘The Russian peasant commune after the reforms of the 1860s’, ^ Slavic Review (3, 1985). Owen, L. A. The Russian Peasant Movement 1906-17 (1937) ch.1. Pallot, J. ‘The development of peasant land holding from emancipation to the Revolution, in Bater, J. H. & French, R. A., eds., Studies in Russian Historical Geography, (vol.1, 1983). Watters, F. M. ‘The peasant and the village commune’, in Vucinich, W. S., ed., ^ The Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Russia (1968).On peasant society see: Atkinson, D. ‘The zemstvo and the peasantry’, in Emmons, T. & Vucinich, W. S., eds., The Zemstvo in Russia (1982). Eklof, B. Russia’s Peasant Schools: Officialdom, Village Culture and Popular Pedagogy 1861-1914 (1986) part 4. _____ ‘Ways of seeing: recent Anglo-American studies of the Russian peasant (1861-1914)’, ^ Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas (1, 1988). Engel, B. A. Between the Fields and the City: Women, Work, & Family in Russia 1861-1914 (1994) chs.1-4, conclusion. _____ ‘Russian peasant views of city life 1861-1914’, Slavic Review (3, 1993).Frank, S. P. Crime, Cultural Conflict and Justice in Rural Russia 1856-1914 (1999).Frank, S. & ^ Cultures in Flux: Lower-Class Values, Practices, and Resistance in Late Steinberg, D., eds. Imperial Russia (1994) articles by Engel, Konechnyi, Worobec. Frieden, N. M. ‘Child care: medical reform in a traditionalist culture’, in Ransel, D. L., ed., The Family in Imperial Russia: New Lines of Historical Research (1976). Frierson, C. A. ‘Crime and punishment in the Russian village: rural concepts of criminality at the end of the nineteenth century’, ^ Slavic Review (46, 1, 1987). _____ ‘Razdel: the peasant family divided’, Russian Review (46, 1, 1987). Klibanov, A. ‘Problems of the ideology of peasant movements (1850s-1860s)’, Russian History (2-3, 1984). Macey, D. A. J. Government and Peasant in Russia 1861-1906 (1987) part 1. Tian-Shanskaia, O. S. ^ Village Life in Late Tsarist Russia (1993). Vucinich, W. S., ed. The Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Russia (1968) articles by Matossian, Treadgold. Worobec, C. D. ‘Customary law and property devolution among Russian peasants in the 1870s’, Canadian Slavonic Papers (2-3, 1984). _____ ‘Temptress or virgin? The precarious sexual position of women in postemancipation Ukrainian peasant society’, ^ Slavic Review (2, 1990). _____ ‘Witchcraft beliefs and practices in prerevolutionary Russian and Ukrainian villages’, Russian Review (2, 1995).Lecture 7: The fractured class: WorkersWhat were the social origins of the workforce? What was the extent of proletarianization? Was there a ‘working class’ in late nineteenth-century Russia? What effect did the expansion of the labour force have on the level of urbanization?On working-class formation see: Crisp, O. ‘Labour and industrialization in Russia’, in ^ The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (vol.8 part 2 1965). Ekonomakis, E. G. ‘Patterns of migration and settlement in pre-revolutionary St Petersburg: peasants from Iaroslavl’ and Tver’ provinces’, Russian Review (1, 1997). Heer, D. The demographic transition of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union’, ^ Journal of Social History (1, 1968). Johnson, R. E ‘Family relations and the rural-urban nexus’, in Ransel, D. L., ed., The Family in Imperial Russia: New Lines of Historical Research (1976). Johnson, R. ‘Peasant migration and the Russian working class: Moscow at the end of the nineteenth century’, ^ Slavic Review (4, 1976). McKay, J. Pioneers for Profit: Foreign Entrepreneurship and Russian Industrialization 1885-1913 (1970) ch.7. Mendelsohn, E. Class Struggle in the Pale: The Formative Years of the Jewish Workers’ Movement in Tsarist Russia (1970) ch.1. Rimlinger, G. ‘The expansion of the labour market in capitalist Russia’, ^ Journal of Economic History (21, 1961). von Laue, T. H. ‘Russian labor between field and factory 1892-1903’, California Slavic Studies (3, 1964). _____ ‘Russian peasants in the factory 1892-1904’, Journal of Economic History (21, 1961).On working-class life see: Bonnell, V. ^ Roots of Rebellion: Workers’ Politics and Organizations in St Petersburg and Moscow 1900-1914 (1983) ch.1. Brooks, J. ‘Readers and reading at the end of the tsarist era’, in Todd, W. M., ed., Literature and Society in Imperial Russia 1800-1914 (1978). Engel, B. A. Between the Fields and the City: Women, Work, & Family in Russia 1861-1914 (1994) chs.4-7, conclusion. _____ ‘Women, work and family in the factories of rural Russia’, ^ Russian History (2-4, 1989). Glickman, R. Russian Factory Women: Workplace and Society 1880-1914 (1984) chs.1-5. Koenker, D. ‘Urban families’, in Ransel, D. L., ed., The Family in Imperial Russia: New Lines of Historical Research (1976). Rimlinger, G. Autocracy and the factory order in early Russian industrialization’, Journal of Economic History (20, 1960). Schneiderman, R. Sergei Zubatov and Revolutionary Marxism (1970) ch.1. Zelnik, R. Labor and Society in Tsarist Russia: The Factory Workers of St Petersburg, 1855-1870 (1971) chs.6-7. _____ ‘The peasant in the factory’, in Vucinich, W. S., ed., The Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Russia (1968). _____ A Radical Worker in Tsarist Russia: The Autobiography of Semën Ivanovich Kanatchikov (1986) chs.10-18.^ Lecture 8: The missing class: The bourgeoisieDid industrialization and the Great Reforms generate a native bourgeoisie? What effects did the ‘counter-reforms’ have on the ‘political nation’? How effective was the attempt to impose ideological hegemony? To what extent had the ‘middling ranks’ of Russian society become politicized by the end of the century?Guroff, G. & ^ Entrepreneurship in Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union (1982) articles by Carstensen, F., eds. Anan’ich, Armstrong, Blackwell, Owen. Bill, V. The Forgotten Class: The Russian Bourgeoisie from the Earliest Beginnings to 1900 (1959) chs.1,3,5,6-8. Freeze, G. L. ‘Caste and emancipation: the changing status of clerical families in the Great Reforms’, in Ransel, D. L., ed., ^ The Family in Imperial Russia: New Lines of Historical Research (1976). McKay, J. Pioneers for Profit: Foreign Entrepreneurship and Russian Industrialization 1885-1913 (1970) chs.1-2, conclusion. Owen, T. C. Capitalism and Politics in Russia: A Social History of the Moscow Merchants 1855-1905 (1981) ch.2. _____ ‘The Moscow merchants and the public press 1858-68’, ^ Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas (23, 1975). Pilbeam, P. M. The Middle Classes in Europe 1789-1914: France, Germany, Italy and Russia (1990) chs.1,4,6-7,9. Portal, R. Muscovite industrialists: the cotton sector 1861-1914’, in Blackwell, W. L., ed., Russian Economic Development form Peter the Great to Stalin (1974). Raeff, M. ‘Some reflections on Russian liberalism’ ^ Russian Review (3, 1959). Trotsky, L. D. 1905 (1973) ch.2. Wagner, W. G. ‘Legislative reform of inheritance 1861-1914’, in Butler, W. E., ed., Russian Law: Historical and Political Perspectives (1977).On the ‘political nation’ see: Acton, E. ‘The Russian intelligentsia and industrialization’, in Bartlett, R. P., ed., ^ Russian Thought and Society 1800-1917: Essays in Honour of Eugene Lampert (1984). Black. C. E. ‘The modernization of Russian society’, in Black, C. E., ed., The Transformation of Russian Society (1960). Dudgeon, R. A. ‘The forgotten minority: women students in Imperial Russia 1872-1917’, ^ Russian History (1, 1982). Elkin, B. ‘The Russian intelligentsia on the eve of the Revolution’, in Pipes, R., ed., The Russian Intelligentsia (1961).Emmons, T. & Vucinich, W. S., eds. The Zemstvo in Russia (1982) articles by Johnson, Manning. Frohlich, K. ^ The Emergence of Russian Constitutionalism 1900-1904 (1981) chs.2-3. Galai, S. The Liberation Movement in Russia 1900-1905 (1973) ch.1. Hamburg, M. ‘The Russian nobility on the eve of the 1905 revolution’, Russian Review (3, 1979). McKay, J. Pioneers for Profit: Foreign Entrepreneurship and Russian Industrialization 1885-1913 (1970) ch.8. Owen, T. C. Capitalism and Politics in Russia: A Social History of the Moscow Merchants 1855-1905 (1981) ch.6. Pipes, R. Struve: Liberal on the Left 1870-1905 (1970) chs.11-12. Raeff, M. ‘A reactionary liberal: M. N. Katkov’, Russian Review (3, 1952). Schapiro, L. ‘The pre-revolutionary intelligentsia and the legal order’, in Pipes, R., ed., The Russian Intelligentsia (1961). Stites, R. The Women’s Liberation Movement in Russia. Feminism, Nihilism and Bolshevism 1860-1930 (1978) ch.6.Modernization and revolution c.1870-1904Lecture 9: Heroic society: народничество and terrorWhat ideas motivated the various revolutionary individuals and groups? Was there a constituency for revolution? What were the effects of the terror campaigns?On the social background see: Glickman, R. ‘An alternative view of the peasantry: the raznochinsty writers of the 1860s’, Slavic Review (4, 1973). _____ ^ Training the Nihilists: Education and Radicalism in Tsarist Russia (1975) chs.1,4,6. Stites, R. The Women’s Liberation Movement in Russia. Feminism, Nihilism and Bolshevism 1860-1930 (1978) ch.5. Trice, T. ‘Rites of protest: Populist funerals in Imperial St Petersburg 1876-78’, Slavic Review (1, 2001).On the theory and practice of populism see: Billington, J. H. Mikhailovsky and Russian Populism (1958) chs.5-10.Engel, B. A. & Rosenthal, C. N., eds. Five Sisters: Women Against the Tsar (1975) Memoir of Vera Zasulich. Hare, R. Portraits of Russian Personalities Between Reform and Revolution (1959) chs.2,7. Kimball, A. ‘The Russian past and socialist future in the thought of Peter Lavrov’, Slavic Review (1, 1971). Mendel, A. Dilemmas of Progress in Tsarist Russia: Legal Marxism and Legal Populism (1961) chs.1-3. Naimark, N. M. Terrorists and Social Democrats: The Russian Revolutionary Movement Under Alexander III (1983) chs.1-2. Offord, D. Nineteenth-Century Russia: Opposition to Autocracy (1999). _____ The Russian Revolutionary Movement in the 1880s (1986) parts 1-3. Perrie, M. The Agrarian Policy of the Russian Socialist Revolutionary Party (1976) ch.1. ‘ Pipes, R. Russia’s Failed Revolutions (1981) ch.2. _____ Russia Observed: Collected Essays on Russian and Soviet History (1989) ch.5. Pomper, P. The Russian Revolutionary Intelligentsia (1970) ch.5. Radkey, O. The Agrarian Foes of Bolshevism (1958) ch.1. Schwarz, S. M. ‘Populism and early Russian marxism on ways of economic development in Russia: the 1880s and 1890s’, in Simmons, E. J., ed., Continuity and Change in Russian and Soviet Thought (1955). Walicki, A. The Controversy Over Capitalism: Studies in the Social Philosophy of the Russian Populists (1969) ch.2.On the impact of populism see: Daly, J. W. ^ Autocracy under Siege: Security Police and Opposition in Russia 1866-1905 (1998). Field, D. ‘Peasants and propagandists in the Russian movement to the people of 1874’, Journal of Modern History (September 1987). McKinsey, P. S. ‘From city workers to peasantry: the beginning of the Russian movement “To the People”’, ^ Slavic Review (4, 1979). Pearl, D. L. ‘Educating workers for revolution: Populist propaganda in St Petersburg’, Russian History/Histoire Russe (2-4, 1988). Zelnik, R. ‘Populists and workers: the first encounter between Populist students and industrial workers in St Petersburg’, ^ Soviet Studies (24, 1972).Associated primary source:Программа исполнительного комитета партии «Народной воли» and Письмо исполнительного комитета партии «Народной воли» к Александру III.^ Lecture 10: Claiming the future: Marxism and socialismWhy did marxism take root in Russia? How was marxism adapted to Russian conditions? What divided the marxists and what united them? How effective was revolutionary social-democracy?On classical marxism see: Marx, K. ^ A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859) preface.Marx, K. & Engels, F. The Communist Manifesto (1848) preface to the 1882 Russian ed., parts 1-2.On the origins of Russian marxism see: Baron, S. H. ‘Plekhanov and the origins of Russian marxism’, Russian Review (1, 1954). _____ Plekhanov: The Father of Russian Marxism (1963) chs.5-7. Belfer, E. ‘Zemlya vs. volya – from narodnichestvo to marxism’, Soviet Studies (3, 1978). Haimson, L. The Russian Marxists and the Origins of Bolshevism (1955) chs.3-4. Keep, J. H. L. The Rise of Social Democracy in Russia (1963) ch.1. Kindersley, R. The First Russian Revisionists: A Study of Legal Marxism in Russia (1962) ch.1. Plekhanov, G. V. ‘Our differences’, in G. V. Plekhanov, Selected Philosophical Works (1961-81). Service, R. Lenin: A Political Life (vol.1, 1985). Walicki, A. The Controversy Over Capitalism: Studies in the Social Philosophy of the Russian Populists (1969) ch.3.On the debates between marxists see: Baron, S. H. Plekhanov: The Father of Russian Marxism (1963) ch.13. Haimson, L. The Russian Marxists and the Origins of Bolshevism (1955) ch.5. Harding, N. Lenin’s Political Thought (vol.1, 1977) chs.2-4. Keep, J. H. L. The Rise of Social Democracy in Russia (1963) ch.2. Kindersley, R. The First Russian Revisionists: A Study of Legal Marxism in Russia (1962) introduction, ch.6. Mendel, A. Dilemmas of Progress in Tsarist Russia: Legal Marxism and Legal Populism (1961) chs.4-5. Pipes, R. Russia Observed: Collected Essays on Russian and Soviet History (1989) ch.6. _____ Struve: Liberal on the Left 1870-1905 (1970) chs.3-5. Radkey, O. The Agrarian Foes of Bolshevism (1958) ch.2. Service, R. Lenin: A Political Life (vol.1, 1985) chs.4-5. Treadgold, D. W. Lenin and His Rivals (1955) chs.4-5. Wortman, R. The Crisis of Russian Populism (1967).On the impact of marxism see: Kingston-Mann, E. ‘Marxism and Russian rural development: problems of evidence, experience, and culture’, American Historical Review (86, 4, 1981). McKinsey, P. S. ‘The Kazan Square demonstration and the conflict between Russian workers and intelligenty ‘, Slavic Review (1, 1985). Mendelsohn, E. Class Struggle in the Pale: The Formative Years of the Jewish Workers’ Movement in Tsarist Russia (1970) ch.2. Naimark, N. M. Terrorists and Social Democrats: The Russian Revolutionary Movement Under Alexander III (1983) chs.7-8. Offord, D. The Russian Revolutionary Movement in the 1880s (1986) part 4. Pipes, R. Russian Social Democracy and the St Petersburg Labour Movement 1885-1897 (1963) chs.4-6. Schneiderman, R. Sergei Zubatov and Revolutionary Marxism (1970) ch.7. Stites, R. The Women’s Liberation Movement in Russia. Feminism, Nihilism and Bolshevism 1860-1930 (1978) ch.8. Wildman, A. K. The Making of a Workers’ Revolution. Russian Social Democracy 1891-1903 (1967) ch.6.Lecture 11: Autocracy as anachronism?: Economic and political crisisHow powerful were the challenges to the regime and how well equipped was it to confront them? Did the social and economic system stand in contradiction to the autocratic system at the beginning of the twentieth century?On the economy see: Discussion On agriculture: ^ Slavic Review (3, 1978). Gerschenkron, A. ‘Agrarian policies and industrialization: Russia 1861-1917’, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (vol.6 part 2, 1965). Robbins, R. C. Famine in Russia 1891-1892: The Imperial Government Responds to Crisis (1975) chs.1,5,conculsion. Sims, J. ‘The crisis in Russian agriculture at the end of the nineteenth century: a different view’, ^ Slavic Review (3, 1977). _____ ‘The crop failure of 1891: soil exhaustion, technological backwardness, and Russia’s “agrarian crisis”’, Slavic Review (2, 1982). von Laue, T. H ‘A secret memorandum of Sergei Witte on the industrialization of Russia, ^ Journal of Modern History (26, 1954). _____ Sergei Witte and the Industrialization of Russia (1963) ch.7. Willets, H. T. ‘The agrarian problem’, in Katkov, G. & Oberländer, E., eds., Russia Enters the Twentieth Century (1971). Wolfe, B. ‘Backwardness and industrialization in Russian history and thought’, ^ Slavic Review (2, 1967).On opposition and unrest see: Discussion On labour violence: Slavic Review (3, 1982). Emmons, T. ‘Russia’s banquet campaign’, California Slavic Studies (10, 1977). Friedgut, T. ‘Labor violence and regime brutality in Tsarist Russia: the Iuzovka cholera riots of 1892’, ^ Slavic Review (2, 1987). Galai, S. The Liberation Movement in Russia 1900-1905 (1973) ch.4. Johnson, R. E. ‘Strikes in Moscow, 1880-1900’, Russian History (1, 1978). Mendelsohn, E. Class Struggle in the Pale: The Formative Years of the Jewish Workers’ Movement in Tsarist Russia (1970) chs.5,7. Mixter, T. ‘Of grandfather beaters and fat-heeled pacifists: perceptions of agricultural labor and hiring market disturbances in Saratov 1872-1905’, ^ Russian History/Histoire Russe (7, 3 1980). Smith, S. A. ‘Workers and civil rights in tsarist Russia 1899-1917’, in Crisp, O. & Edmonson, L., eds., Civil Rights in Imperial Russia (1989). Zelnik, R. ‘Russian workers and the revolutionary movement’, Journal of Social History (6, 1972).On managing popular unrest see: Griffin, F. C. ‘The “First Russian Labor Code”: the law of June 3 1886’, ^ Russian History (2, 1975). _____ ‘The formative years of the Russian factory inspectorate 1882-1885’, Slavic Review (4, 1966). _____ ‘The role of the Plehve Commission in the Russian factory laws of 1885 and 1886’, European Studies Review (2, 1972). Rimlinger, G. ‘The management of labour protest in tsarist Russia 1870-1905’, ^ International Review of Social History (5, 1960). Schneiderman, R. Sergei Zubatov and Revolutionary Marxism (1970) ch.6. von Laue, T. H. ‘Factory inspectors under Witte’, Slavic Review (19, 1960).The Duma Monarchy and its problems c.1905-14Lecture 12: 1905-6: Bourgeois revolution?Was there one revolution or many revolutions? What forces were at work and what role was played by the political parties? How did the government try to deal with revolution? Did the events of 1905-6 create the pre-conditions for ‘bourgeois democracy’?On participants in revolution see: Bushnell, J. ‘The Revolution of 1905-06 in the army: the incidence and importance of mutiny’, ^ Russian History (1, 1985). Edelman, R. ‘Rural proletarians and peasant disturbances: the Right Bank Ukraine in the Revolution of 1905’, Journal of Modern History (June 1985). Engelstein, L. Moscow 1905: Working-Class Organization and Political Conflict (1982) chs.1,4,6-7. Perrie, M. ‘The Russian peasant movement of 1905-1907, its social composition and revolutionary significance’, ^ Past and Present (57, 1972). Prevro, K. ‘Vornonezh in 1905: workers and politics in a provincial city’, Russian History (1, 1985). Raun, T. ‘The Revolution of 1905 in the Baltic provinces and Finland’, Slavic Review (3, 1984). Seregny, S. ‘A different type of peasant movement: the Peasant Unions in the Russian Revolution of 1905’, ^ Slavic Review (1, 1988).On political groups see: Galai, S. The Liberation Movement in Russia 1900-1905 (1973) part 3. _____ ‘The role of the Union of Unions in the Revolution of 1905’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas (4, 24, 1976). Gard, W. G. ‘The party and the proletariat in Ivanovo-Voznesensk, 1905’, ^ Russian History (2, 1975). Melancon, M. ‘The Socialist Revolutionaries from 1902 to 1907: peasant and workers’ party’, Russian History (1, 1985). Rogger, H. ‘The formation of the Russian right 1900-1906’, California Slavic Studies (3, 1964). Trotsky, L. D. 1905 (1971) chs.1-4,8,10,17-20.On government and the first two dumas see: Emmons, T. The Formation of Political Parties in Russia and the First National Elections in Russia (1983) part 2. Levin, A. The Second Duma: A Study of Social Democracy and the Russian Constitutional Experiment (1966) ch.15.Mehlinger, H. D. & Thompson, J. M. Count Witte and the Tsarist Government in the 1905 Revolution (1972). Rice, C. ‘“Land and Freedom” in the factories of Petersburg: the SRs and the workers’ curia elections to the second duma, January 1907’, ^ Soviet Studies (1, 1984). Sanders, J. ‘Lessons from the periphery: Saratov, January 1905’, Slavic Review (2, 1987). Turnbull, D. ‘The defeat of popular representation, December 1904: Prince Mirskii, Witte and the Imperial family’, Slavic Review (1, 1989). Verner, A. M. The Crisis of Russian Autocracy: Nicholas II and the 1905 Revolution (1990). Zimmerman, J. E. ‘The Kadets and the Duma 1905-07’, in Timberlake, C., ed., ^ Essays on Russian Liberalism (1972).Associated primary source:Манифест об усовершенствовании государственного порядка (Манифест 17 Октября 1905 г.) and С. Ю. Витте, Письмо о Манифесте 17 Октября 1905 г.^ Lecture 13: 1907-14: Stolypin’s gambleWhy did the government turn against the Dumas? To what extent did the ‘coup of June 3rd’ stabilize the situation? Why did Stolypin attempt large-scale social engineering in the Russian countryside? How successful were Stolypin’s policies?On the ‘wager on the strong’ see: Atkinson, D. ‘The statistics on the Russian land commune 1905-1917’, ^ Slavic Review (4, 1973). Baker, A. B. ‘Deterioration or development? The peasant economy of Moscow province prior to 1914’, Russian History (1, 1978). Engel, B. A. Between the Fields and the City: Women, Work, & Family in Russia 1861-1914 (1994) chs.1-4, conclusion. Levin, A. ‘Peter Arkad’evich Stolypin: a political appraisal’, ^ Journal of Modern History (4, 1965). Mosse, W. ‘Stolypin’s villages’, Slavonic & East European Review (43, 1964-5). Pallot, J. ‘Khutora and otruba in Stolypin’s program of farm individualization’, Slavic Review (2, 1984). _____ Land Reform in Russia 1906-1917: Peasant Responses to Stolypin’s Project of Rural Transformation (1999). Tian-Shanskaia, O. S. Village Life in Late Tsarist Russia (ed. D. Ransel, 1993). Tokmakoff, G. ‘Stolypin’s agrarian reform: an appraisal’, ^ Russian Review (2, 1971). Willets, H. ‘The agrarian problem’, in Katkov, G. & Oberländer, E., eds., Russia Enters the Twentieth Century 1894-1917 (1970). Yaney, G. L. ‘The concept of the Stolypin land reform’, Slavic Review (2, 1964).On society and politics see: Edelman, R. ^ Gentry Politics on the Eve of the Russian Revolution: The Nationalist Party 1907-1917 (1980) chs.2,6. Galai, S. ‘The tragic dilemma of Russian Liberalism as reflected in Il’ic Petrunkevic’s letters to his son’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas (1, 29, 1981). Haimson, L. H., ed. The Politics of Rural Russia 1905-1914 (1979) articles by Haimson, Vinogradoff. Hutchinson, J. F. ‘The Octobrists and the future of Imperial Russia as a Great Power’, ^ Slavonic & East European Review (50, 119, 1972) Korros, A. S A Reluctant Parliament: Stolypin, Nationalism and the Politics of the Imperial State Council 1906-11 (2002). McKean, R. B. The Russian Constitutional Monarchy 1907-17 (Historical Association pamphlets 91, 1977). Manning, R. T. ‘The zemstvo and politics 1864-1914’, in Emmons, T. & Vucinich, W. S., eds., ^ The Zemstvo in Russia (1982). Oberländer, E. ‘The role of the political parties’, in Katkov, G. & Oberländer, E., eds., Russia Enters the Twentieth Century 1894-1917 (1971). Rogger, H. ‘Was there a Russian fascism? The Union of Russian People’, Journal of Modern History (4, 1964). Rosenberg, W. G. ‘Kadets and the politics of ambivalence 1905-17’, in Timberlake, C., ed., ^ Essays on Russian Liberalism (1972). Ruud, C & Stepanov, S. Fontanka 16: The Tsar’s Secret Police (1999).On the third and fourth dumas see: Hosking, G. A. The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Democracy 1907-1914 (1973) chs.1-2,7-9. Levin, A. The Third Duma: Election and Profile (1973) ch.11. Pinchuk, B-C. The Octobrists in the Third Duma 1907-1912 (1974) conclusion. Riha, T. ‘Constitutional developments in Russia’, in Stavrou, T., ed., Russia Under the Last Tsar (1969). Tokmakoff, G. P. A. Stolypin and the Third Duma (1981) chs.1,4,5.Russia in revolution c.1914-17Lecture 14: Russia and world war: 1914-16Why did Russia become involved in war? How successful was the Russian war effort? Did the Great War retard or accelerate the movement towards revolution?On the industrial economy see: Gatrell, P. ‘Big business and the state in Russia 1915-1918: the engineering lobby’, in J. Cooper, et al., eds., ^ Soviet History 1917-53: Essays in honour of R. W. Davies (1995). _____ ‘Industrial expansion in Tsarist Russia 1908-14’, Economic History Review (35, 1982). Roosa, R. A. ‘Russian industrialists and “state socialism” 1906-1917’, Soviet Studies (23, 1972). Thalheim, K. C. ‘Russia’s economic development’, in Katkov, G. & Oberländer, E., eds., ^ Russia Enters the Twentieth Century 1894-1917 (1970). von Laue, T. H. ‘Problems of industrialization’, in Stavrou, T., ed., Russia Under the Last Tsar (1969).On the war see: Discussion On peasant responses to war: Slavic Review (2, 2000). Ferro, M. The Great War 1914-1918 (1973). Hamm, M. F. ‘Liberal politics in wartime Russia: an analysis of the Progressive Bloc’, ^ Slavic Review (3, 1974