Этимология английских слов (The etymology of english words)

МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ СТОЛИЧНЫЙ ИНСТИТУТ ПЕРЕВОДЧИКОВ ФАКУЛЬТЕТ АНГЛИЙСКОГО ЯЗЫКА РЕФЕРАТ THE ETYMOLOGY OF ENGLISH WORDS Выполнила: Научный руководитель: МОСКВА 2000 CONTENTS Survey of certain historical facts 3 Structural elements of borrowings 7 Why Are Words Borrowed?

8 Do Borrowed Words Change or do They Remain the Same? 8 International Words 9 Etymological Doublets 10 Translation-Loans 10 Are Etymological and Stylistic Characteristics of Words Interrelated? 10 SURVEY OF CERTAIN HISTORICAL FACTS It is true that English vocabulary, which is one of the most extensive among the world's languages

con¬tains an immense number of words of foreign origin. Explanations for this should be sought in the history of the language which is closely connected with the histo¬ry of the nation speaking the language. THE FIRST CENTURY B. C. Most of the territory now known to us as Europe was occupied by the Roman Em¬pire. Among the inhabitants of the

Europe are Ger¬manic tribes. Theirs stage of devel¬opment was rather primitive, especially if compared with the high civiliza¬tion of Rome. They are primitive cattle-breeders and know almost nothing about land cultiva¬tion. Their tribal languages contain only Indo-European and Germanic elements. Due to Roman invasion Germanic tribes had to come into contact with Romans .

Romans built roads, bridges, military camps. Trade is carried on, and the Ger¬manic people gain knowledge of new and useful things. The first among them are new things to eat. It has been mentioned that Germanic cattle-breeding was on a primitive scale. Its only products known to the Ger¬manic tribes were meat and milk.

It is from the Romans that they learn how to make butter and cheese and, as there are naturally no words for these foodstuffs in their tribal languages, they had to use the Latin words to name them (Lat. “butyrum”, “caseus”). It is also to the Romans that the Germanic tribes owe the knowledge of some new fruits and vegetables of which they had no idea before, and the Latin names of these fruits and vegetables entered their vocabularies:

“cherry” (Lat. “cerasum”), “pear” (Lat. “pirum”), “plum” (Lat. “prunus”), “pea” (Lat. “pisum”), “beet” (Lat. “beta”), “pepper” (Lat. “piper”). Here are some more examples of Latin borrowings of this period: “cup” (Lat. “cuppa”), “kitchen” (Lat. “coquina”), “mill” (Lat. “molina”), “port” (Lat. “portus”), “wine” (Lat. “vinum”). The Germanic tribal languages gained a considerable num¬ber of new words and were thus enriched.

Latin words became the earliest group of borrow¬ings in the future English language which was - much later - built on the basis of the Germanic tribal languages. THE FIFTH CENTURY A.D. Several of the Germanic tribes (the most numerous among them were the An¬gles, the Saxons and the Jutes) migrated across the sea to the

British Isles. There they were confronted by the Celts, the original inhabitants of the Isles. The Celts desperately defend¬ed their lands against the invaders, but nevertheless gradually yielded most of their territory. They retreated to the North and South-West (modern Scotland, Wales and Cornwall). Through numerous contacts with the defeated Celts, the conquerors borrowed a number of

Celtic words (bald, down, glen, bard, cradle). Especially numerous among the Celtic borrowings were place names, names of riv¬ers, hills, etc. The Germanic tribes occupied the land, but the names of many parts of their ter¬ritory remained Celtic. For instance, the names of the rivers Avon, Exe, Esk, Usk, Ux originate from Celtic words meaning "river" and "water".

Ironically, even the name of the English capital originates from Celtic “Llyn+dun” in which “llyn” is an¬other Celtic word for "river" and “dun” stands for "a for¬tified hill" - the meaning of the whole is "fortress on the hill over the river". Some Latin words entered the Anglo-Saxon lan¬guages through Celtic, among them such widely-used words as “street” (Lat. strata via) and “wall” (Lat. vallum).

THE SEVENTH CENTURY A.D. This century was signifi¬cant for the christianization of England. Latin was the official language of the Christian church, and con¬sequently the spread of Christianity was accompanied by a new period of Latin borrowings. These borrowings no longer came from spoken Latin as they did eight centuries ear¬lier, but from church Latin. Also, these new Latin bor¬rowings were very different in meaning from the earli¬er ones.

They mostly indicated persons, objects and ideas associated with church and religious rituals: e. g. priest (Lat. presbyter), bishop (Lat. episcopus), monk (Lat. monachus), nun (Lat. nonna), candle (Lat. candela). It was quite natural that education¬al terms were also Latin borrowings, for the first schools in England were church schools, and the first teachers priests and monks. So, the very word “school” is a Latin borrowing (Lat. schola, of

Greek origin) and so are such words as “scholar” (Lat. Scholar(-is) and “magister” (Lat. magister). From THE END OF THE 8th century to THE MIDDLE OF THE 11th century England underwent several Scandinavian inva¬sions. Here are some examples of early Scandinavian borrowings: call (v.), take (v.), cast (v.), die (v.),

law (n.), husband (n.), window (n.), ill (adj.), loose, (adj.), low (adj.), weak (adj.). Some of Scandinavian borrowings are easily recogniz¬able by the initial (sk-) combination. E. g. sky, skill, skin, ski, skirt. Certain English words changed their meanings under the influence of Scandinavian words of the same root. So, the old English “bread” which meant "piece" acquired its modern meaning by association with the

Scandinavian “braud”. The old English “dream” which meant "joy" assimi¬lated the meaning of the Scandinavian “draumr’’. 1066. With the famous Battle of Hastings, when the English were defeated by the Normans under William the Conqueror, began the eventful epoch of the NORMAN CONQUEST. The Norman culture of the 11th century was certainly superior to that of the

Saxons. The result was that English vocabulary acquired a great number of French words. But instead of being smashed and broken by the powerful intrusion of the foreign element, the English language managed to preserve its essential structure and vastly enriched its expressive resources with the new borrowings. England became a bilingual country, and the impact on the English vo¬cabulary made over this two-hundred-years period is immense:

French words from the Norman dialect pene¬trated every aspect of social life. Here is a very brief list of examples of Norman French borrowings. Administrative words: state, government, parlia¬ment, council, power. Legal terms: court, judge, justice, crime, prison. Military terms: army, war, soldier, officer, battle, enemy.

Educational terms: pupil, lesson, library, science, pen, pencil. Terms of everyday life: table, plate, dinner, supper, river, autumn, uncle, etc. THE RENAISSANCE PERIOD. In England, as in all Euro¬pean countries, this period was marked by significant developments in science, art and culture and, also, by a revival of interest in the ancient civilizations of Greece and Rome and their languages. Hence, there occurred a considerable number of

Latin and Greek borrowings. In contrast to the earliest Latin borrowings (1st century B.C.), the Renaissance ones were rarely concrete names. They were mostly abstract words (e. g. major, minor, moderate, intelligent, permanent, to elect, to create). There were numerous scientific and artistic terms (e.g. datum, status, phenomenon, philosophy, meth¬od, music). Quite a number of words were bor¬rowed into

English from Latin and had earlier come into Latin from Greek. The Renaissance was a period of extensive cultural contacts between the major European states. There¬fore, it was only natural that new words also entered the English vocabulary from other European languag¬es. The most significant were French borrow¬ings. This time they came from the

Parisian dialect of French and are known as Parisian borrowings. Exam¬ples: routine, police, machine, ballet, matinee, scene, technique, bourgeois, etc. Italian also contributed a considerable number of words to English, e. g. piano, violin, opera, alarm, colo¬nel. The historical survey above shows the ways in which

English vocabulary developed and of the major events through which it acquired its vast modern re¬sources. Summary is shown in the table 1. The second column of the table contains more groups, but it also implies a great quantity of words. Modern scholars estimate the per¬centage of borrowed words in the English vocabulary at 65—70 per cent which is an exceptionally high figure. It means that the native element doesn’t pre¬vail.

This anomaly is explained by the country's event¬ful history and by its many international contacts. Considering the high percentage of borrowed words, one would have to clas¬sify English as a language of international origin or, at least, a Romance one (as French and Latin words obvi¬ously prevail). But here another factor comes into play: the native element in

English comprises a large number of high-frequency words like the articles, prepositions, pronouns, conjunctions, auxiliaries and, also, words denoting everyday objects and ideas (e. g. house, child, water, go, come, eat, good, bad, etc.). Furthermore, the grammatical structure is essen¬tially Germanic and it remains unaffected by foreign influence. The Etymological Structure of English Vocabulary table 1

The native element The borrowed element 1.Indo-European element I. Celtic (5th – 6th c.A.D.). 2.Germanic element II. Latin 1st group: 1st c.B.C. 2st group: 7th c.A.C. 3st group: the Renaissance period 3.English Proper element (no earlier than 5th c.A.D.) III. Scandinavian (8th – 11th c.A.D.) IV. French 1.

Norman borrowings: 11th–13th c.A.D. 2. Parisian borrowings (Renaissance) V. Greek (Renaissance) VI. Italian (Renaissance and later) VII. Spanish (Renaissance and later) VIII. German IX. Indian X. Russian and some other groups The first column of the table consists of three groups, only the third being dated: the words of this group appeared in the

English vocabulary in the 5th century or later, that is, after the Germanic tribes migrated to the British Isles. The tribal languages of the Angles, the Saxons, the Jutes, by the time of their migration, con¬tained only words of Indo-European and Germanic roots plus a certain number of the earliest Latin bor¬rowings. By the Indo-European element are meant words of roots common to all (or most) languages

of the Indo-Eu¬ropean group. The words of this group denote ele¬mentary concepts without which no human communi¬cation would be possible. The following groups can be identified. 1. Family relations: father, mother, brother, son, daughter. 2. Parts of the human body: foot, nose, lip, heart. 3. Animals: cow, swine, goose. 4. Plants: tree, birch, corn.

5. Time of day: day, night. 6. Heavenly bodies: sun, moon, star. 7. Numerous adjectives: red, new, glad, sad. 8. The numerals from one to a hundred. 9. Pronouns - personal (except “they” which is a Scandinavian borrowing) and demonstrative. 10. Numerous verbs: be, stand, sit, eat, know. The Germanic element represents words of roots common to all or most

Germanic languages. Some of the main groups of Germanic words are the same as in the Indo-European element. 1. Parts of the human body: head, hand, arm, finger, bone. 2. Animals: bear, fox, calf. 3. Plants: oak, fir, grass. 4. Natural phenomena: rain, frost. 5. Seasons of the year: winter, spring, summer . 6. Landscape features: sea, land. 7. Human dwellings and furniture: house, room, bench.

8. Sea-going vessels: boat, ship. 9. Adjectives: green, blue, grey, white, small, thick, high, old, good. 10. Verbs: see, hear, speak, tell, say, answer, make, give, drink. The English proper ele¬ment is opposed to the first two groups. For not only it can be approximately dated, but these words have another distinctive feature: they are specifically English have no cognates in other lan¬guages whereas for

Indo-European and Germanic words such cognates can always be found, as, for in¬stance, for the following words of the Indo-European group. Star: Germ Stern, Lat Stella, Gr aster. Stand: Germ. – stehen, Lat stare, R. – стоять. Here are some examples of English proper words: bird, boy, girl, lord, lady, woman, daisy, always. STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF BORROWINGS There are certain structural features which enable us to

identify some words as borrowings and even to de¬termine the source language. We have already estab¬lished that the initial (sk) usually indicates Scandinavian origin. We can also recognize words of Latin and French origin by certain suffixes, prefixes or endings. Here are some typical and frequent structural elements of

Latin and French borrowings: Latin affixes of nouns: The suffix (-ion): legion, opinion, etc.; the suffix (-tion): relation, temptation, etc. Latin affixes of verbs: The suffix (-ate): appreciate, create, congratulate, etc.; the suffix (-ute): attribute, distribute, etc.; the remnant suffix (-ct): act, collect, conduct, etc.; the prefix (dis-): disable, disagree, etc. Latin affixes of adjectives:

The suffix (-able): detestable, curable, etc.; the suffix (-ate): accurate, graduate, etc.; the suffix (-ant): constant, important, etc.; the suffix (-ent): absent, evident, etc.; the suffix (-or): major, senior, etc.; the suffix (-al): final, maternal, etc.; the suffix (-ar): solar, familiar, etc. French affixes of nouns: The suffix (-ance): endurance, hindrance, etc.; the suffix (-ence): consequence, patience, etc.; the suffix (-ment): appointment, development, etc.; the suffix (-age): courage, marriage,

village, etc.; the suffix (-ess): actress, adventuress, etc. French affixes of verbs: The prefix (en-): enable, enact, enslave, etc. French affixes of adjectives: The suffix (-ous): curious, dangerous, etc. It’s important to note that later formations derived from native roots borrowed Latin and French affixes (e.g. eatable, lovable). WHY

ARE WORDS BORROWED? Sometimes it is done to fill a gap in vocabulary. When the Saxons borrowed Latin words for "butter", "plum", "beet", they did it because their own vocabu¬laries lacked words for these new objects. For the same reason the words “potato” and “tomato” were borrowed by English from Spanish when these vegetables were first brought to

England by the Spaniards. But there is also a great number of words which are borrowed for other reasons. There may be a word (or even several words) which expresses some particular concept, so that there is no gap in the vocabulary and there does not seem to be any need for borrowing. However a word is borrowed because it supplies a new shade of meaning or a different emotional colouring though it represents the same concept. This type of borrow¬ing enlarges groups of synonyms and provides

to enrich the expressive resources of the vocabulary. That is how the Latin “cordial” was added to the native “friendly”, the French “desire” to “wish”, the Latin “admire” and the French “adore” to “like” and “love”. The historical circumstances stimulate the borrowing process. Each time two nations come into close contact. The nature of the contact may be different.

It may be wars, invasions or conquests when foreign words are imposed upon the conquered nation. There are also periods of peace when the process of borrowing is due to trade and international cultural relations. DO BORROWED WORDS CHANGE OR DO THEY REMAIN THE SAME? When words migrate from one language into another they ad¬just themselves to their new environment and get adapted to the norms of the recipient language.

They undergo certain changes which gradually erase their foreign features, and, finally, they are assimilated. Sometimes the process of assimilation develops to the point when the foreign origin of a word is quite unrec¬ognizable. It is difficult to believe now that such words as “dinner”, “cat”, “take”, “cup” are not English by origin. Others, though well assimilated, still bear traces of their foreign background. “Distance” and “development”, for instance, are identified as borrowings by their

French suffixes, “skin” and “sky” by the Scandinavian ini¬tial (-sk), “police” and “regime” by the French stress on the last syllable. Borrowed words are adjusted in the three main areas of the new language system: the phonetic, the grammatical and the semantic. The lasting nature of phonetic adaptation is best shown by comparing Norman French borrowings to later (Parisian) ones.

The Norman borrowings have for a long time been fully adapted to the phonetic system of the English language: such words as “table”, “plate”, “courage”, “chivalry” bear no phonetic traces of their French origin. Some of the later (Parisian) borrowings, even the ones borrowed as early as the 15th century, still sound surpris¬ingly French: “regime”, “valise”, “matinee”, “cafe”, “ballet”. In these cases phonetic adaptation is not completed.

Grammatical adaptation consists in a complete change of the former paradigm of the borrowed word. If it is a noun, it is certain to adopt, sooner or later, a new system of declension; if it is a verb, it will be conjugated according to the rules of the recipient language. Yet, this is also a lasting process. The Russian noun “пальто” was borrowed from French early in the 19th century and has not yet acquired the

Rus¬sian system of declension. The same can be said about such English Renaissance borrowings as “datum” (pl. da¬ta), “phenomenon” (pl. phenomena), “criterion” (pl. crite¬ria) whereas earlier Latin borrowings such as “cup”, “plum”, “street”, “wall” were fully adapted to the grammati¬cal system of the language long ago. By semantic adaptation is meant adjustment to the system of meanings of the vocabulary.

Sometimes a word may be borrowed "blindly" for no obvious reason: they are not want¬ed because there is no gap in the vocabulary nor in the group of synonyms which it could fill. Quite a number of such "accidental" borrowings are very soon rejected by the vocabulary and forgotten. But some “blindly” borrowed words managed to estab¬lish itself due to the pro¬cess of semantic adaptation. The adjective “large”, for in¬stance, was borrowed from

French in the meaning of "wide". It was not actually wanted, because it fully co¬incided with the English adjective “wide” without adding any new shades or aspects to its meaning. This could have led to its rejection. Yet, “large” managed to establish itself very firmly in the English vocabulary by se¬mantic adjustment. It entered another synonymic group with .the general meaning of “big in size”. Still bearing some features of its former meaning it is successfully competing with

“big” having approached it very closely, both in fre¬quency and meaning. INTERNATIONAL WORDS It is often the case that a word is borrowed by several languages, not just by one. Such words usually convey concepts which are significant in the field of com¬munication. Many of them are of Latin and Greek origin. Most names of sciences are international (e. g. philosophy, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, linguistics, lexicology).

There are also numerous terms of art in this group: music, theatre, drama, tragedy, comedy, artist, primadonna, etc.; and the sports terms: football, volley-ball, baseball, hockey, cricket, rugby, tennis, golf, etc. It is quite natural that political terms frequently oc¬cur in the international group of borrowings: politics, policy, revolution, progress, democracy, communism, anti-militarism. 20th century scientific and technological advances brought a great number of new international words:

atomic, antibiotic, radio, television, sputnik (a Russian borrowing). Fruits and foodstuffs imported from exotic coun¬tries often transport their names too and become inter¬national: coffee, cocoa, chocolate, banana, mango, avocado, grapefruit. The similarity of such words as the English “son”, the German “Sohn” and the Russian “сын” should not lead one to the quite false conclusion that they are

international words. They represent the Indo-European group of the native element in each respec¬tive language and are cognates, i. e. words of the same etymological root, and not borrowings. ETYMOLOGICAL DOUBLETS The words originating from the same etymological source, but differing in phonemic shape and in meaning are called etymological doublets. They may enter the vocabulary by different routes.

Some of these pairs consist of a native word and a borrowed word: “shrew”, n. (E.) – “screw”, n. (Sc.). Others are represented by two borrowings from dif¬ferent languages: “canal” (Lat.) - “channel” (Fr.), “captain” (Lat.) — “chieftain” (Fr.). Still others were borrowed from the same language twice, but in different periods: “travel” (Norm. Fr.) - “tra¬vail" (Par. Fr.), “cavalry” (Norm. Fr.) - “chivalry” (Par. Fr.), “gaol” (Norm.

Fr.) - “jail” (Par. Fr.). A doublet may also consist of a shortened word and the one from which it was derived: “history” - “story”, “fantasy” - “fancy”, “defence” - “fence”, “shadow” - “shade”. Etymological triplets (i. e. groups of three words of common root) occur rarer, but here are at least two ex¬amples: “hospital” (Lat.) — “hostel” (Norm. Fr.) — “hotel” (Par. Fr.), “to capture” (Lat.) — “to catch” (Norm.

Fr.) — “to chase” (Par. Fr.). TRANSLATION-LOANS By translation-loans we indicate borrowings of a special kind. They are not taken into the vocabulary of another language more or less in the same phonemic shape in which they have been functioning in their own lan¬guage, but undergo the process of translation. It is quite obvious that it is only compound words (i. e. words of two or more stems). Each stem was translated separate¬ly: “masterpiece” (from

Germ. “Meisterstuck”), “wonder child” (from Germ. “Wunderkind”), ”first dancer” (from Ital. “prima-ballerina”). ARE ETYMOLOGICAL AND STYLISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF WORDS INTERRELATED? The answer must be affirma¬tive. Among learned words and terminology the for¬eign element dominates the native. It also seems that the whole opposition of "formal versus informal" is based on the deeper

underlying opposition of "bor¬rowed versus native", as the informal style, especial¬ly slang and dialect, abounds in native words even though it is possible to quote numerous exceptions. In point of comparing the expressive and stylistic value of the French and the English words the French ones are usually more formal, more refined, and less emotional. “to begin” – “to commence”, “to wish” — “to desire”, “hap¬piness" — “felicity”.

English words are much warmer than their Latin synonyms, they don’t sound cold and dry: “motherly” — “maternal”, “fatherly” — “paternal”, “childish” — “infan¬tile", “daughterly” — “filial”, etc. 1. Г.Б.Антрушина, О.В.Афанасьева. Лексикология английского языка М. Изд. Дрофа. 1999 2. F.R.Palmer. Semantics. A new outline M. V.Sh. 1982 МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ

СТОЛИЧНЫЙ ИНСТИТУТ ПЕРЕВОДЧИКОВ ФАКУЛЬТЕТ АНГЛИЙСКОГО ЯЗЫКА РЕФЕРАТ THE ETYMOLOGY OF ENGLISH WORDS Выполнила: Научный руководитель: МОСКВА 2000 CONTENTS Survey of certain historical facts 3 Structural elements of borrowings 7 Why Are Words Borrowed? 8 Do Borrowed Words Change or do They Remain the Same?

8 International Words 9 Etymological Doublets 10 Translation-Loans 10 Are Etymological and Stylistic Characteristics of Words Interrelated? 10 SURVEY OF CERTAIN HISTORICAL FACTS It is true that English vocabulary, which is one of the most extensive among the world's languages con¬tains an immense number of words of foreign origin.

Explanations for this should be sought in the history of the language which is closely connected with the histo¬ry of the nation speaking the language. THE FIRST CENTURY B. C. Most of the territory now known to us as Europe was occupied by the Roman Em¬pire. Among the inhabitants of the Europe are Ger¬manic tribes. Theirs stage of devel¬opment was rather primitive, especially if compared

with the high civiliza¬tion of Rome. They are primitive cattle-breeders and know almost nothing about land cultiva¬tion. Their tribal languages contain only Indo-European and Germanic elements. Due to Roman invasion Germanic tribes had to come into contact with Romans . Romans built roads, bridges, military camps. Trade is carried on, and the

Ger¬manic people gain knowledge of new and useful things. The first among them are new things to eat. It has been mentioned that Germanic cattle-breeding was on a primitive scale. Its only products known to the Ger¬manic tribes were meat and milk. It is from the Romans that they learn how to make butter and cheese and, as there are naturally no

words for these foodstuffs in their tribal languages, they had to use the Latin words to name them (Lat. “butyrum”, “caseus”). It is also to the Romans that the Germanic tribes owe the knowledge of some new fruits and vegetables of which they had no idea before, and the Latin names of these fruits and vegetables entered their vocabularies: “cherry” (Lat. “cerasum”), “pear” (Lat. “pirum”), “plum” (Lat. “prunus”), “pea” (Lat. “pisum”), “beet”

(Lat. “beta”), “pepper” (Lat. “piper”). Here are some more examples of Latin borrowings of this period: “cup” (Lat. “cuppa”), “kitchen” (Lat. “coquina”), “mill” (Lat. “molina”), “port” (Lat. “portus”), “wine” (Lat. “vinum”). The Germanic tribal languages gained a considerable num¬ber of new words and were thus enriched. Latin words became the earliest group of borrow¬ings in the future

English language which was - much later - built on the basis of the Germanic tribal languages. THE FIFTH CENTURY A.D. Several of the Germanic tribes (the most numerous among them were the An¬gles, the Saxons and the Jutes) migrated across the sea to the British Isles. There they were confronted by the Celts, the original inhabitants of the

Isles. The Celts desperately defend¬ed their lands against the invaders, but nevertheless gradually yielded most of their territory. They retreated to the North and South-West (modern Scotland, Wales and Cornwall). Through numerous contacts with the defeated Celts, the conquerors borrowed a number of Celtic words (bald, down, glen, bard, cradle). Especially numerous among the

Celtic borrowings were place names, names of riv¬ers, hills, etc. The Germanic tribes occupied the land, but the names of many parts of their ter¬ritory remained Celtic. For instance, the names of the rivers Avon, Exe, Esk, Usk, Ux originate from Celtic words meaning "river" and "water". Ironically, even the name of the English capital originates from

Celtic “Llyn+dun” in which “llyn” is an¬other Celtic word for "river" and “dun” stands for "a for¬tified hill" - the meaning of the whole is "fortress on the hill over the river". Some Latin words entered the Anglo-Saxon lan¬guages through Celtic, among them such widely-used words as “street” (Lat. strata via) and “wall” (Lat. vallum). THE SEVENTH CENTURY A.D. This century was signifi¬cant for the christianization of

England. Latin was the official language of the Christian church, and con¬sequently the spread of Christianity was accompanied by a new period of Latin borrowings. These borrowings no longer came from spoken Latin as they did eight centuries ear¬lier, but from church Latin. Also, these new Latin bor¬rowings were very different in meaning from the earli¬er ones. They mostly indicated persons, objects and ideas associated with church and religious rituals: e. g.

priest (Lat. presbyter), bishop (Lat. episcopus), monk (Lat. monachus), nun (Lat. nonna), candle (Lat. candela). It was quite natural that education¬al terms were also Latin borrowings, for the first schools in England were church schools, and the first teachers priests and monks. So, the very word “school” is a Latin borrowing (Lat. schola, of Greek origin) and so are such words as “scholar” (Lat.

Scholar(-is) and “magister” (Lat. magister). From THE END OF THE 8th century to THE MIDDLE OF THE 11th century England underwent several Scandinavian inva¬sions. Here are some examples of early Scandinavian borrowings: call (v.), take (v.), cast (v.), die (v.), law (n.), husband (n.), window (n.), ill (adj.), loose, (adj.), low (adj.), weak (adj.).

Some of Scandinavian borrowings are easily recogniz¬able by the initial (sk-) combination. E. g. sky, skill, skin, ski, skirt. Certain English words changed their meanings under the influence of Scandinavian words of the same root. So, the old English “bread” which meant "piece" acquired its modern meaning by association with the Scandinavian “braud”. The old English “dream” which meant "joy" assimi¬lated the meaning of

the Scandinavian “draumr’’. 1066. With the famous Battle of Hastings, when the English were defeated by the Normans under William the Conqueror, began the eventful epoch of the NORMAN CONQUEST. The Norman culture of the 11th century was certainly superior to that of the Saxons. The result was that English vocabulary acquired a great number of

French words. But instead of being smashed and broken by the powerful intrusion of the foreign element, the English language managed to preserve its essential structure and vastly enriched its expressive resources with the new borrowings. England became a bilingual country, and the impact on the English vo¬cabulary made over this two-hundred-years period is immense: French words from the Norman dialect pene¬trated every aspect of social life.

Here is a very brief list of examples of Norman French borrowings. Administrative words: state, government, parlia¬ment, council, power. Legal terms: court, judge, justice, crime, prison. Military terms: army, war, soldier, officer, battle, enemy. Educational terms: pupil, lesson, library, science, pen, pencil.

Terms of everyday life: table, plate, dinner, supper, river, autumn, uncle, etc. THE RENAISSANCE PERIOD. In England, as in all Euro¬pean countries, this period was marked by significant developments in science, art and culture and, also, by a revival of interest in the ancient civilizations of Greece and Rome and their languages. Hence, there occurred a considerable number of Latin and Greek borrowings. In contrast to the earliest

Latin borrowings (1st century B.C.), the Renaissance ones were rarely concrete names. They were mostly abstract words (e. g. major, minor, moderate, intelligent, permanent, to elect, to create). There were numerous scientific and artistic terms (e.g. datum, status, phenomenon, philosophy, meth¬od, music). Quite a number of words were bor¬rowed into English from Latin and had earlier come into Latin from

Greek. The Renaissance was a period of extensive cultural contacts between the major European states. There¬fore, it was only natural that new words also entered the English vocabulary from other European languag¬es. The most significant were French borrow¬ings. This time they came from the Parisian dialect of French and are known as Parisian borrowings.

Exam¬ples: routine, police, machine, ballet, matinee, scene, technique, bourgeois, etc. Italian also contributed a considerable number of words to English, e. g. piano, violin, opera, alarm, colo¬nel. The historical survey above shows the ways in which English vocabulary developed and of the major events through which it acquired its vast modern re¬sources.

Summary is shown in the table 1. The second column of the table contains more groups, but it also implies a great quantity of words. Modern scholars estimate the per¬centage of borrowed words in the English vocabulary at 65—70 per cent which is an exceptionally high figure. It means that the native element doesn’t pre¬vail. This anomaly is explained by the country's event¬ful history and by its many international contacts.

Considering the high percentage of borrowed words, one would have to clas¬sify English as a language of international origin or, at least, a Romance one (as French and Latin words obvi¬ously prevail). But here another factor comes into play: the native element in English comprises a large number of high-frequency words like the articles, prepositions, pronouns,

conjunctions, auxiliaries and, also, words denoting everyday objects and ideas (e. g. house, child, water, go, come, eat, good, bad, etc.). Furthermore, the grammatical structure is essen¬tially Germanic and it remains unaffected by foreign influence. The Etymological Structure of English Vocabulary table 1 The native element The borrowed element 1.Indo-European element

I. Celtic (5th – 6th c.A.D.). 2.Germanic element II. Latin 1st group: 1st c.B.C. 2st group: 7th c.A.C. 3st group: the Renaissance period 3.English Proper element (no earlier than 5th c.A.D.) III. Scandinavian (8th – 11th c.A.D.) IV. French 1. Norman borrowings: 11th–13th c.A.D. 2. Parisian borrowings (Renaissance)

V. Greek (Renaissance) VI. Italian (Renaissance and later) VII. Spanish (Renaissance and later) VIII. German IX. Indian X. Russian and some other groups The first column of the table consists of three groups, only the third being dated: the words of this group appeared in the English vocabulary in the 5th century or later, that is, after the

Germanic tribes migrated to the British Isles. The tribal languages of the Angles, the Saxons, the Jutes, by the time of their migration, con¬tained only words of Indo-European and Germanic roots plus a certain number of the earliest Latin bor¬rowings. By the Indo-European element are meant words of roots common to all (or most) languages of the Indo-Eu¬ropean group. The words of this group denote ele¬mentary concepts without which no human

communi¬cation would be possible. The following groups can be identified. 1. Family relations: father, mother, brother, son, daughter. 2. Parts of the human body: foot, nose, lip, heart. 3. Animals: cow, swine, goose. 4. Plants: tree, birch, corn. 5. Time of day: day, night. 6. Heavenly bodies: sun, moon, star.

7. Numerous adjectives: red, new, glad, sad. 8. The numerals from one to a hundred. 9. Pronouns - personal (except “they” which is a Scandinavian borrowing) and demonstrative. 10. Numerous verbs: be, stand, sit, eat, know. The Germanic element represents words of roots common to all or most Germanic languages. Some of the main groups of Germanic words are the same as in the

Indo-European element. 1. Parts of the human body: head, hand, arm, finger, bone. 2. Animals: bear, fox, calf. 3. Plants: oak, fir, grass. 4. Natural phenomena: rain, frost. 5. Seasons of the year: winter, spring, summer . 6. Landscape features: sea, land. 7. Human dwellings and furniture: house, room, bench. 8. Sea-going vessels: boat, ship. 9. Adjectives: green, blue, grey, white, small, thick, high, old,

good. 10. Verbs: see, hear, speak, tell, say, answer, make, give, drink. The English proper ele¬ment is opposed to the first two groups. For not only it can be approximately dated, but these words have another distinctive feature: they are specifically English have no cognates in other lan¬guages whereas for Indo-European and Germanic words such cognates can always be found, as, for in¬stance, for the following

words of the Indo-European group. Star: Germ Stern, Lat Stella, Gr aster. Stand: Germ. – stehen, Lat stare, R. – стоять. Here are some examples of English proper words: bird, boy, girl, lord, lady, woman, daisy, always. STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF BORROWINGS There are certain structural features which enable us to identify some words as borrowings and even to de¬termine the source language.

We have already estab¬lished that the initial (sk) usually indicates Scandinavian origin. We can also recognize words of Latin and French origin by certain suffixes, prefixes or endings. Here are some typical and frequent structural elements of Latin and French borrowings: Latin affixes of nouns:

The suffix (-ion): legion, opinion, etc.; the suffix (-tion): relation, temptation, etc. Latin affixes of verbs: The suffix (-ate): appreciate, create, congratulate, etc.; the suffix (-ute): attribute, distribute, etc.; the remnant suffix (-ct): act, collect, conduct, etc.; the prefix (dis-): disable, disagree, etc. Latin affixes of adjectives: The suffix (-able): detestable, curable, etc.; the suffix (-ate): accurate, graduate, etc.; the suffix

(-ant): constant, important, etc.; the suffix (-ent): absent, evident, etc.; the suffix (-or): major, senior, etc.; the suffix (-al): final, maternal, etc.; the suffix (-ar): solar, familiar, etc. French affixes of nouns: The suffix (-ance): endurance, hindrance, etc.; the suffix (-ence): consequence, patience, etc.; the suffix (-ment): appointment, development, etc.; the suffix (-age): courage, marriage, village, etc.; the suffix (-ess): actress, adventuress, etc.

French affixes of verbs: The prefix (en-): enable, enact, enslave, etc. French affixes of adjectives: The suffix (-ous): curious, dangerous, etc. It’s important to note that later formations derived from native roots borrowed Latin and French affixes (e.g. eatable, lovable). WHY ARE WORDS BORROWED? Sometimes it is done to fill a gap in vocabulary.

When the Saxons borrowed Latin words for "butter", "plum", "beet", they did it because their own vocabu¬laries lacked words for these new objects. For the same reason the words “potato” and “tomato” were borrowed by English from Spanish when these vegetables were first brought to England by the Spaniards. But there is also a great number of words which are borrowed for other reasons.

There may be a word (or even several words) which expresses some particular concept, so that there is no gap in the vocabulary and there does not seem to be any need for borrowing. However a word is borrowed because it supplies a new shade of meaning or a different emotional colouring though it represents the same concept. This type of borrow¬ing enlarges groups of synonyms and provides to enrich the expressive resources of the vocabulary.

That is how the Latin “cordial” was added to the native “friendly”, the French “desire” to “wish”, the Latin “admire” and the French “adore” to “like” and “love”. The historical circumstances stimulate the borrowing process. Each time two nations come into close contact. The nature of the contact may be different. It may be wars, invasions or conquests when foreign words are imposed upon the conquered nation.

There are also periods of peace when the process of borrowing is due to trade and international cultural relations. DO BORROWED WORDS CHANGE OR DO THEY REMAIN THE SAME? When words migrate from one language into another they ad¬just themselves to their new environment and get adapted to the norms of the recipient language. They undergo certain changes which gradually erase their foreign features, and, finally, they are assimilated.

Sometimes the process of assimilation develops to the point when the foreign origin of a word is quite unrec¬ognizable. It is difficult to believe now that such words as “dinner”, “cat”, “take”, “cup” are not English by origin. Others, though well assimilated, still bear traces of their foreign background. “Distance” and “development”, for instance, are identified as borrowings by their French suffixes, “skin” and “sky” by the Scandinavian ini¬tial (-sk), “police” and “regime” by the

French stress on the last syllable. Borrowed words are adjusted in the three main areas of the new language system: the phonetic, the grammatical and the semantic. The lasting nature of phonetic adaptation is best shown by comparing Norman French borrowings to later (Parisian) ones. The Norman borrowings have for a long time been fully adapted to the phonetic system of the

English language: such words as “table”, “plate”, “courage”, “chivalry” bear no phonetic traces of their French origin. Some of the later (Parisian) borrowings, even the ones borrowed as early as the 15th century, still sound surpris¬ingly French: “regime”, “valise”, “matinee”, “cafe”, “ballet”. In these cases phonetic adaptation is not completed. Grammatical adaptation consists in a complete change of the former paradigm of the borrowed word.

If it is a noun, it is certain to adopt, sooner or later, a new system of declension; if it is a verb, it will be conjugated according to the rules of the recipient language. Yet, this is also a lasting process. The Russian noun “пальто” was borrowed from French early in the 19th century and has not yet acquired the Rus¬sian system of declension. The same can be said about such

English Renaissance borrowings as “datum” (pl. da¬ta), “phenomenon” (pl. phenomena), “criterion” (pl. crite¬ria) whereas earlier Latin borrowings such as “cup”, “plum”, “street”, “wall” were fully adapted to the grammati¬cal system of the language long ago. By semantic adaptation is meant adjustment to the system of meanings of the vocabulary. Sometimes a word may be borrowed "blindly" for no obvious reason: they are not want¬ed because

there is no gap in the vocabulary nor in the group of synonyms which it could fill. Quite a number of such "accidental" borrowings are very soon rejected by the vocabulary and forgotten. But some “blindly” borrowed words managed to estab¬lish itself due to the pro¬cess of semantic adaptation. The adjective “large”, for in¬stance, was borrowed from French in the meaning of "wide". It was not actually wanted, because it fully co¬incided with

the English adjective “wide” without adding any new shades or aspects to its meaning. This could have led to its rejection. Yet, “large” managed to establish itself very firmly in the English vocabulary by se¬mantic adjustment. It entered another synonymic group with .the general meaning of “big in size”. Still bearing some features of its former meaning it is successfully competing with “big” having approached it very closely, both in fre¬quency and meaning.

INTERNATIONAL WORDS It is often the case that a word is borrowed by several languages, not just by one. Such words usually convey concepts which are significant in the field of com¬munication. Many of them are of Latin and Greek origin. Most names of sciences are international (e. g. philosophy, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, linguistics, lexicology). There are also numerous terms of art in this group: music, theatre, drama, tragedy, comedy, artist,

primadonna, etc.; and the sports terms: football, volley-ball, baseball, hockey, cricket, rugby, tennis, golf, etc. It is quite natural that political terms frequently oc¬cur in the international group of borrowings: politics, policy, revolution, progress, democracy, communism, anti-militarism. 20th century scientific and technological advances brought a great number of new international words: atomic, antibiotic, radio, television, sputnik (a

Russian borrowing). Fruits and foodstuffs imported from exotic coun¬tries often transport their names too and become inter¬national: coffee, cocoa, chocolate, banana, mango, avocado, grapefruit. The similarity of such words as the English “son”, the German “Sohn” and the Russian “сын” should not lead one to the quite false conclusion that they are international words. They represent the Indo-European group of the native element in each respec¬tive

language and are cognates, i. e. words of the same etymological root, and not borrowings. ETYMOLOGICAL DOUBLETS The words originating from the same etymological source, but differing in phonemic shape and in meaning are called etymological doublets. They may enter the vocabulary by different routes. Some of these pairs consist of a native word and a borrowed word: “shrew”, n. (E.) – “screw”, n. (Sc.

). Others are represented by two borrowings from dif¬ferent languages: “canal” (Lat.) - “channel” (Fr.), “captain” (Lat.) — “chieftain” (Fr.). Still others were borrowed from the same language twice, but in different periods: “travel” (Norm. Fr.) - “tra¬vail" (Par. Fr.), “cavalry” (Norm. Fr.) - “chivalry” (Par. Fr.), “gaol” (Norm. Fr.) - “jail” (Par. Fr.). A doublet may also consist of a shortened word and the one from which it

was derived: “history” - “story”, “fantasy” - “fancy”, “defence” - “fence”, “shadow” - “shade”. Etymological triplets (i. e. groups of three words of common root) occur rarer, but here are at least two ex¬amples: “hospital” (Lat.) — “hostel” (Norm. Fr.) — “hotel” (Par. Fr.), “to capture” (Lat.) — “to catch” (Norm. Fr.) — “to chase” (Par. Fr.). TRANSLATION-LOANS By translation-loans we indicate borrowings of a special

kind. They are not taken into the vocabulary of another language more or less in the same phonemic shape in which they have been functioning in their own lan¬guage, but undergo the process of translation. It is quite obvious that it is only compound words (i. e. words of two or more stems). Each stem was translated separate¬ly: “masterpiece” (from Germ. “Meisterstuck”), “wonder child” (from Germ. “Wunderkind”), ”first dancer” (from

Ital. “prima-ballerina”). ARE ETYMOLOGICAL AND STYLISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF WORDS INTERRELATED? The answer must be affirma¬tive. Among learned words and terminology the for¬eign element dominates the native. It also seems that the whole opposition of "formal versus informal" is based on the deeper underlying opposition of "bor¬rowed versus native", as the informal style, especial¬ly slang

and dialect, abounds in native words even though it is possible to quote numerous exceptions. In point of comparing the expressive and stylistic value of the French and the English words the French ones are usually more formal, more refined, and less emotional. “to begin” – “to commence”, “to wish” — “to desire”, “hap¬piness" — “felicity”. English words are much warmer than their Latin synonyms, they don’t sound cold and dry: “motherly”

— “maternal”, “fatherly” — “paternal”, “childish” — “infan¬tile", “daughterly” — “filial”, etc. 1. Г.Б.Антрушина, О.В.Афанасьева. Лексикология английского языка М. Изд. Дрофа. 1999 2. F.R.Palmer. Semantics. A new outline M. V.Sh. 1982