Poetry And Politics Essay Research Paper

[Davidman's

poems about the Spanish Civil War in Letter to a Comrade oppose General Francisco

Franco and support freedom fighters associated with the Loyalists. The following excerpt by Malcolm Cowley reflects

the position that, according to Daniel Aaron, most American communist and non-communists

intellectuals believed. The Spanish Civil War

(1936-39) was a power struggle between the elected Spanish government (the Loyalists) and

the Nationalists, the rebels in the Spanish army led by Franco. The war's international dimension, in which the

communist Soviet Union supported the Loyalists and fascist Italy and nazi Germany

supported Franco, shaped the lens through which American leftist intellectuals interpreted

the war. According to Daniel Aaron, they

believed that backing the loyalists was equivalent to supporting "democracy and

morality" and rejecting totalitarian fascism (Writers on the Left 157). American critic Malcolm Cowley clarifies these

political terms when he defines the opposing parties as representing two approaches to

life that correspond to the larger class problem of the dominator and the dominated.]

Macolm Cowley

From "To Madrid: V"

Back

in the states . . . people of my sort were more deeply stirred by the Spanish civil war

than by any other international event since the World War and the Russian revolution.

. . .

It

seemed to me then–and it still seems– that the conflict between two systems of life was

clearer in Spain than anywhere else in the world. On

that side were the landlords, the

generals, the bishops, the banks, the old tradition of class intolerance. . . . But on

this side were the peasants, the artisans, the small tradesmen, the painters and poets,

the human sympathy, the aspiration of a poverty-stricken people toward more knowledge,

more freedom, more of everything. And unless this

side won in Spain, then the same process of revolt and foreign intervention might be

repeated in Czechoslovakia, in France, in all the free nations of Europe.

From

Malcolm Cowley, "To Madrid V," The New Republic, 6 Oct. 1937: 237; pt.

5 of a series, To Madrid, begun 25 Aug. 1937.

[See

also Langston Hughes. In "Negroes in Spain," Hughes applies a similar anti-fascist

lens to Black people.]

Shaemas O’Sheel

Introductory Note to Seven Poets in Search of an Answer

[In

1944, Thomas Yoseloff edited Seven Poets in Search of an Answer, a poetic

symposium in which Maxwell Bodenheim, Joy Davidman, Langston Hughes, Aaron Kramer, Alfred

Kreymborg, Martha Millet, and Norman Rosten attacked fascism. Davidman contributed "Spartacus 1938,"

"The Dead Partisan," "Dirge for the Suicides," "For the

Nazis," "Elegy for Garcia Lorca," "Trojan Women," and "New

Spiritual." This invaluable anthology

illustrates that modern poets engaged crucial issues and, as Shaemas O'Sheel explains,

their involvement continues a long and venerable tradition of political activism in

Western and American literature.]

Poets:

are they delicate creatures dealing with sweet sentiments and mystic fancies, but not with

stern social and political issues? The

notion is dear to scoffers, but down the ages the great voices refute it: Euripides’

social-political challenge; Dante lashing tyranny; Shakespeare dissecting injustice; in

the stormy dawn of the democratic era, Byron and Shelley, Hunt and Blake championing

political and intellectual freedom; and in the Nineteenth century, the Brownings,

Swinburne, Morris and Blunt in England, Heine, Hugo, Carducci and many another on the

Continent, winning new frontiers against superstition and privilege and crying out against

exploitation and imperialism.

When

in this native land of modern liberty singers of stature arose–Bryant, Emerson,

Longfellow, Lowell, Holmes–they thought it was natural to use poetry as a weapon against

slavery and secession. And Whitman,

increasingly as he matured, used his mighty chant to cheer on democracy on many fronts.

It has

been said that today’s poets shirk their place in today’s battle. From a wealth of contrary evidence, consider only

two exhibits. When the Spanish people stood

up to fascist treason and invasion, their poets as one man served them with song; so that

when the civil war was only a year old it was possible to gather fifty translations from

thirty Spanish poets, which twenty-seven American poets adapted to make the book . . .

[sic] And Spain Sings, published for the benefit of Spanish relief. And a book issued last year, War Poems of the

United Nations, assembles three hundred poems vibrant with the horror and heroism of

the world’s present agony, by one hundred and fifty poets of twenty countries. Fifty-five are Americans; and among them are five

of the seven poets whose search for an answer is the theme of the present volume.

They

are in the great tradition; it is unthinkable that poets worthy of the name could ignore

the terrifying question confronting our times. Man

has made some progress, painfully through millenia, toward knowledge, toward intelligent

use of his powers and the resources of the world he lives in, toward justice, toward

dignity: shall this progress be brutally halted and reversed? Man has conceived the ideal of brotherhood and a

good life for all: shall this ideal be choked in his blood?

Shall science be perverted to the sole service of exploitation, and art

become the whore of the exploiters? A society

at last is taking form in which all shall share in the fruits of intelligent cooperation;

but the unlaid demons in human nature say this shall not come to pass; greed and avarice,

hatred and violence say the world shall be a place where a few shall enjoy the abundance

produced by millions, toiling under the lash, brutalized, and in their misery smiting each

other in the names of race and religion. Such

are the issues making up the question to which these poets are seeking and finding an

answer.

In

this hour of the world’s agony, of flaming cities and dying men, of murdered women and

children, in this hour of the heartbreak of parting, they have found these particulars of

the answer: to cry out; to resist; to resume the great tradition of poetry as a sword

against evil; to turn a fierce light on features of the beast; to tear off the masks of

fascism; to mourn fallen heroes and praise their deeds . . . .

. . .

And

what of the problems we posed: to learn the clarion-call, to move men to anger and action? In older days the people were often fired and

welded by ballads sung on the streets and sold on penny broadsides. Perhaps we need that sort of poetry again, to

seize the popular imagination and stir the people’s emotions; that will set more feet

marching against fascism, upset the plots of traitors and force the timid hands of

statesmen. And perhaps such poetry would get

written if poets came together and made their art, to the necessary measure, a

cooperative one. I would like to see poets

meet, survey the needs of this tremendous hour, map deliberate campaigns: books of high

poetry; ballads celebrating our heroes and our cause; doggerel to take the hide off

Hitlerites; lyrics for rousing popular songs; I believe earnestly that in cooperation and

emulation they find the joy of becoming truly singers of, by and for the people.

This

very book is more than an ordinary anthology. It

is a kind of cooperative assault upon the fascist horror darkening the world. . . .

From

Shaemas O’Sheel, introduction, Seven Poets in Search of an Answer, ed. Thomas

Yoseloff (New York: Bernard Ackerman, 1944) 6-7, 9-10.

Return

to Joy Davidman

32e