The Rise Of Japanese Militarism Essay Research

Paper

Japan’s political journey from its quasi-democratic

government in the 1920’s to its radical nationalism of the mid 1930’s,

the collapse of democratic institutions, and the eventual military

state was not an overnight transformation. There was no coup d’etat,

no march on Rome, no storming of the Bastille. Instead, it was a

political journey that allowed a semi-democratic nation to transform

itself into a military dictatorship. The forces that aided in this

transformation were the failed promises of the Meiji Restoration that

were represented in the stagnation of the Japanese economy, the

perceived capitulation of the Japanese parliamentary leaders to the

western powers, a compliant public, and an independent military.

The ground work for Japanese militarism was a compliant

Japanese public. This pliant public was created through a variety of

factors. Beginning in the 1890’s the public education system

indoctrinated students in the ideas of nationalism, loyalty to the

emperor and traditionalist ideas of self-sacrifice and obedience. Thus

ideas that were originally propagated to mobilize support for the

Meiji government were easily diverted to form broad support for

foreign militarism. Japanese society also still held many of the

remnants of feudal culture such as strong confusion beliefs that

stressed support for social order and lack of emphasis on

individualist values. These values taught obedience not to a

democratic but to the emperor; so the fact that the militaristic

government of the 1930’s ruled under the emperor meant that the

Japanese were loyal to this government just as they had been to the

government of the 1920’s. So when Japan’s militaristic government

implemented programs characteristic of totalitarian governments such

as strong media control, a thought police, and community organizations

the public did little to protest. Shintoism provided a religious

justification for nationalism and support for the militaristic

government. Shintoism before the 1930’s was primarily a nativistic

religion which stressed nature and harmony. But during the 1930’s it

became a ideological weapon teaching Japanese that they were a

superior country that had a right to expand and that its government

was divinely lead by a descendent of the sun god.

The independence and decentralization of the military allowed

it to act largely on its own will as characterized in the Manchurian

incident in 1931 and the Marco Polo bridge explosion in Shanghai.

Because these incidents went unpunished and the Japanese public

rallied around them the military was able to push for greater

militarism and an increasingly active role in government till the

entire government was run by the military. The London Treaty and

Japan’s rejection by large European powers at the Versailles

conference angered many in the military who felt that Japan was being

denied its place at the table with the great powers. This lead to a

disenfranchisement with the parliamentary government who the military

felt had capitulated to the western powers in treaties and by stopping

its colonial expansion during the nineteen twenties. Once Japan

commenced on the path of militarism it found that because of its

technological edge it could defeat other Asian powers this increased

Japan’s sense of superiority and feed the fires of nationalism. These

fires grew as following the 1931 Manchurian incident Japan invaded

Manchuria then most China. In South East Asia Japan quickly expanded

breaking up British, Portuguese, and Dutch colonialism. Japanese

militarism occurred not by an organized plan but rather through

passive acceptance by the Japanese public. A compliant Japanese public

coupled with a independent army were two factors that pushed Japan

toward militarism in the 1930’s.