Gender scorecard for sample department GenderBalance Scorecard: Sample Template Population: Staff in the Professional and higher categories with appointments of one year or more for the period date Distribution of staff per department for the period 1a ^ Gender distribution of staff by grade and department, office, division, branch, service, section and unit for the period : June 2009 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Percentage of women 1b ^ Percentages of female staff representation in DPKO P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 D1 D2 ASG USG December 31, 2007 June 30, 2009 Total increment 2007-2009 Average annual increment (Dec. 2007 - Jun. 2009) Year at which gender parity will be reached at current average annual increment Required average annual increase to achieve gender balance of 50% in all prof categories by 2010 and in all D and above by 2015. Formula 50-B3 divided by 7(number of years) By meeting 2% annual increase target in the HRAPs Selection, career progression and retention 2 ^ Selection rates of staff for the period 1 January - June 2009 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Percentage of women 3 ^ Promotions for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Percentage of women 4 ^ Appointments for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 3 ^ Percentage of women 5 ^ Lateral transfers for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Percentage of women 6 ^ Percentage of women applicants forwarded to PCO, interviewed, placed on recommended lists and selected for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Percentage of women ^ Question will be included and information will be available upon the next survey. 7 Separations and attrition rates excluding retirements for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 ^ Reasons for Separation USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Agreed Termination Percentage of women ^ Appointment Expiration ^ Percentage of women Resignation ^ Percentage of women Termination-Health ^ Percentage of women 8 Performance of HRAP gender balance target for the period : 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Percentages of women 9 ^ Separations by retirement for the period 1 January 2009 - 30 June 2009 and 1 January 2007 – 30 December 2008 USG ASG D-2 D-1 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 Total General Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ^ Retirements 1/1/07 – 30/6/09 ^ Percentage of women ^ Early Retirements 1/1/07 - 31/12/08 ^ Percentage of women ^ Functioning of the Focal Point (FP) system in a Sample Department for the period 1 January – 30 June 2009 Indicators Comments Functioning of the Focal Point (FP) system 10 Number of currently designated Focal Points and Alternates a indicated by survey respondents Focal Point Alternate 11 Information provided by management to Focal Points in the last 6 months STATUS 12 Participation of Focal Points in staff selection panels in the last 6 months 13 Number of meetings with Executive Office/USG in the last 6 months More than times 14 Actions taken by management to increase awareness about the Focal Point in the last 6 months STATUS Description of innovative measures for gender balance and gender sensitivity 15 Measures taken by management to achieve 50/50 gender distribution at the Professional level and above in the last 6 months Information STATUS 16 Measures taken by management to develop and maintain a gender sensitive and supportive work environment in the last 6 months STATUS Use of Flexible Working Arrangements (FWA) 17 Distribution of staff formally using each FWA option, by department, gender, grade and age in the last 6 months 18 Actions taken by management to promote FWA in the last 6 months ^ Gender Profile: Sample DepartmentGender Distribution by Division, Section and Unit as of 1 July 2008 Division/Section/Unit USG ASG D2 D1 P5 P4 P3 P2 Total Grand Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F