GREAT ZIMBABWE Essay Research Paper This

GREAT ZIMBABWE Essay, Research Paper

This article which I have chosen to read,

is about a ruined city of southeast Zimbabwe south of Harare. Great Zimbabwe

is an ancient city on the plateau in sub-Saharan Africa. Great Zimbabwe

was supposedly a city that controlled much trade and culture of southern

Africa during the 12th and 17th centuries because it was stationed on the

shortest route between the northern gold fields, and the Indian Ocean.

Archaeologists believed that this masterful stonework was built somewhere

around 1100 and 1600 A.D.

Great Zimbabwe covers 1,779 acres and is

made up of 3 main structures. The first one is the Hill Complex; Hill Complex

is the oldest part of the site. The hill was approximately 262 feet high.

This enables inhabitants to view enemies from up the hill. Below the Hill

Complex is the Great Enclosure, or Elliptical Building. The most dazzling

structures of Great Zimbabwe are found here. It?s thought to have been

the royal palace at that time. Between these two large structures is the

Valley Ruins. The youngest walls are found here. Some archaeologists deemed

that it might have been the area?s control access, for that the wall enables

people to walk in single file only. Great Zimbabwe has been designed to

change its periphery as the city?s population grew due to the fact that

it wasn?t constructed around a central plan. Despite that the size has

made Great Zimbabwe remarkable, another main factor is its stonework. Many

of the structures were made of blocks cut from granite. The city?s name

comes from the Shona term dzimbabwe, meaning ? houses of stone.?

And, like may other ancient cities, Great

Zimbabwe has been concealed by legend. Many people told myths about Great

Zimbabwe. But, it wasn?t until the late 1800s when archaeological record

became severely damaged an almost not decodable; when Europeans were attracted

by the myth of abundant gold from King Solomon?s mines found in the Great

Zimbabwe.

The first European to arrive to

Great Zimbabwe was a German explorer named Karl Mauch, in 1871. It was

Mauch?s friend, Adam Render, who was also German and was living in the

tribe of Chief Pika, that has lead him to Great Zimbabwe. When Mauch first

saw the ruins, he abruptly concluded that Great Zimbabwe wasn?t erected

by Africans. He felt that the handiwork was too delicate and the people

who constructed this showed they were way too civilized to have been the

work of Africans. He concluded that it was the work of Phoenician or Israelite

settlers; for that a sample of wood from a lintel supporter smelled exactly

like his pencil. Thus, proves that it was cedar and could?ve come from

Lebanon.

After Mauch came, a crew of people working

for W.G. Neal of the Ancient Ruins Company followed; the leader of the

company was Neal. Cecil Rhodes, who was the founder of the British South

Africa Company, financially supported Neal to explore Rhodesian ruins.

This was a great opportunity to learn about Rhodesian ruins, however, Neal

and his comrades were not really going after knowledge. They, instead,

robbed Great Zimbabwe and other Iron Age sites. As well as destroying structures

and throwing ?invaluable? stuff which true archaeologists can use to understand

more about the people who had lived in Great Zimbabwe. In 1902, Neal wrote

a report stating that the architecture was clearly Phoenician or Arabian.

Another serious attack on Great Zimbabwe

ruins was in 1891, when James Theodore Bent from Britain, the 1st official

archaeologists, visited Great Zimbabwe and started digging around. Thus,

destroyed many stratigraphy; which results confusion that made it harder

for later archeologists to find the age of Great Zimbabwe. Bent?s crew

finally proposed that a ?bastard? race— race, in which white invaders

from the north married the Africans— had constructed it.

In 1905, David Randall-Maclver, an Egyptologist,

reasoned that native Africans were the ones who constructed Great Zimbabwe.

For that artifacts unearthed were similar to the ones being used by Shona,

or Karanga, people living nearby, stonework was not Arabic because it was

not arranged in the pattern Arabs do, and Arab beads found dated no older

than 14th or 15th century.

Many other researchers believed in the

same thing. However, most European settlers in Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe,

rejected this theory. From 1965, until the independence of Rhodesia from

England in 1980, Rhodesian Front inspected all books and materials available

on Great Zimbabwe to prevent Africans from gaining power. Archaeologists

who were held the believe that Africans were the founders of Great Zimbabwe

were imprisoned and some were even deported. In addition, Rhodesian Front

also prohibits locals to use Great Zimbabwe for any ceremonies.

Today, people are now finally able to get

information about Great Zimbabwe. Though there?re still some difficulty

studying these ruins, because of past ?mistakes? people have had made.

And, that sub-Saharan countries are not really wealthy to spend much money

on archaeology. But, archaeologists will reclaim the cultural clue that

has survived.